Shikohpur land deal: Robert Vadra denied immediate relief by Delhi HC

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Shikohpur land deal: Robert Vadra denied immediate relief by Delhi HC

Synopsis

Robert Vadra walked out of Delhi High Court without relief on Thursday as the bench declined to stay trial proceedings in the Shikohpur money laundering case and fixed 18 May for the pivotal jurisdiction argument. With the ED alleging ₹58 crore in proceeds of crime and seeking seven years' imprisonment, and the trial court summons still standing for 16 May, Vadra faces pressure on two fronts simultaneously.

Key Takeaways

Delhi High Court denied immediate relief to Robert Vadra on 14 May in the Shikohpur land deal money laundering case.
The matter has been adjourned to 18 May for arguments on jurisdiction and retrospective application of PMLA provisions.
The ED has alleged ₹58 crore in proceeds of crime and provisionally attached 43 properties worth ₹38.69 crore .
Vadra's company Skylight Hospitality allegedly acquired 3.5 acres in Shikohpur for ₹7.50 crore in February 2008 with no actual payment made, according to the ED.
Vadra must still appear before the Rouse Avenue Court on 16 May in compliance with its summons.
Senior IAS officer Ashok Khemka had cancelled the original deal in October 2012 , citing procedural irregularities.

Robert Vadra, businessman and husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi, on Thursday, 14 May failed to secure immediate relief from the Delhi High Court in a money laundering case stemming from a 2008 land deal in Gurugram's Shikohpur village. The court adjourned the matter to 18 May after hearing arguments from both sides.

What the Hearing Covered

A single-judge Bench of Justice Manoj Jain was hearing Vadra's plea challenging a Rouse Avenue Court order that had taken cognisance of an Enforcement Directorate (ED) complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and issued summons to him and eight others.

Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Vadra, argued that some of the predicate offences invoked under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act were added to the PMLA schedule only after the alleged offences were committed between 2008 and 2012. He contended that the question of jurisdiction and retrospective application of provisions had been raised before the trial court but was not addressed.

ED Pushes Back Hard

Opposing the plea, ED counsel Zoheb Hossain submitted that Vadra had made 'false and incorrect statements' in his petition. 'This needs to go with costs. I have done an exercise of pulling out all the bare acts. Complete false submissions. Section 467 IPC was there in its original inception in the PMLA schedule. Ex facie, false and incorrect statements are made,' Hossain submitted.

The ED opposed the plea on maintainability grounds, and Justice Jain directed Singhvi to come prepared on the jurisdiction question at the next hearing. 'Mr Singhvi, please come prepared on this aspect on Monday because that is your central plank. We will hear you on Monday,' the judge said.

The ED's Core Allegations

The ED has alleged that Vadra's company, Skylight Hospitality Private Limited, acquired around 3.5 acres of land in Shikohpur village in February 2008 for ₹7.50 crore from Omkareshwar Properties Private Limited despite having limited capital. According to the agency, no actual payment was made, and the sale deed contained false declarations — including reference to a cheque that was allegedly never issued or encashed.

The ED has further alleged that the land was undervalued in the sale deed, resulting in evasion of stamp duty, constituting an offence under Section 423 of the IPC. In its prosecution complaint, the agency has identified ₹58 crore as proceeds of crime and provisionally attached 43 immovable properties worth ₹38.69 crore allegedly linked to Vadra, his proprietary concern Artex, Skylight Hospitality, and associated entities. The ED has sought a maximum punishment of seven years' rigorous imprisonment under Section 4 of the PMLA, along with confiscation of the attached properties.

Background and Timeline

The case has a long political trail. In October 2012, senior IAS officer Ashok Khemka cancelled the Shikohpur land deal, citing procedural irregularities. An in-house government panel subsequently gave a clean chit to Vadra and DLF, but an FIR was registered after the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government came to power in Haryana.

Earlier, on 15 April, the Rouse Avenue Court had issued summons to Vadra and eight others after taking cognisance of the ED's prosecution complaint, directing them to appear before it on 16 May. Vadra will have to comply with that summons regardless of the High Court proceedings.

With the Delhi High Court now scheduled to hear the jurisdiction argument on 18 May, the case enters a critical phase that could determine whether the trial court proceedings can continue as planned.

Point of View

A question courts have not fully settled. Vadra's legal team is not wrong to raise it, but the ED's sharp rebuttal on Section 467 IPC suggests the agency believes the core charge was always within scope. What is notable is that after more than a decade of political controversy — from Ashok Khemka's cancellation order to successive government inquiries — the matter has finally reached the stage of formal criminal cognisance. Whether the High Court accepts the retrospectivity argument on 18 May will be a significant signal for how PMLA prosecutions involving pre-2013 transactions are treated more broadly.
NationPress
10 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Shikohpur land deal case against Robert Vadra?
The case involves the alleged purchase of around 3.5 acres of land in Shikohpur village, Gurugram, in February 2008 by Vadra's company Skylight Hospitality Private Limited for ₹7.50 crore. The ED alleges no actual payment was made, the land was undervalued to evade stamp duty, and the transaction generated ₹58 crore in proceeds of crime under the PMLA.
Why did the Delhi High Court not give immediate relief to Vadra?
The court adjourned the matter to 18 May to hear Vadra's central argument on jurisdiction and retrospective application of PMLA provisions. Justice Manoj Jain directed senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi to come prepared on that specific legal question before ruling on any interim relief.
What summons has the Rouse Avenue Court issued to Vadra?
The Rouse Avenue Court issued summons to Vadra and eight others on 15 April after taking cognisance of the ED's prosecution complaint. Vadra has been directed to appear before the Special Court on 16 May, irrespective of the High Court proceedings.
What punishment is the ED seeking in the Shikohpur case?
The ED has sought a maximum of seven years' rigorous imprisonment under Section 4 of the PMLA, along with confiscation of 43 provisionally attached immovable properties worth ₹38.69 crore linked to Vadra and associated entities.
What is the background of the Shikohpur land deal controversy?
The deal dates to February 2008, when Skylight Hospitality acquired land in Shikohpur. In October 2012, IAS officer Ashok Khemka cancelled the deal citing procedural irregularities. A government panel later gave Vadra and DLF a clean chit, but an FIR was registered after the BJP came to power in Haryana, eventually leading to the current ED prosecution.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 7 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google