What is the Verdict in the Rape Case Against Ex-JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The verdict in the high-profile case involving Prajwal Revanna, grandson of former PM H.D. Deve Gowda, has been postponed to August 1. This case, filled with controversy and public outcry, revolves around serious allegations of sexual assault and video evidence that emerged during the elections.
Key Takeaways
- The case involves serious allegations of sexual assault.
- Prajwal Revanna has been in jail for 14 months without bail.
- The court is examining key pieces of evidence.
- Public interest in the case remains high.
- Legal proceedings are ongoing, with the next verdict set for August 1.
Bengaluru, July 30 (NationPress) The Special Court for MPs/MLAs in Bengaluru has postponed the ruling in the obscene video and rape case involving former JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna, the grandson of former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda, to August 1. The court indicated that the judgment was delayed due to the need for further clarifications. After requesting additional information from both parties and providing directions, the case was adjourned.
The judge primarily sought clarification on whether Google Maps could be deemed admissible evidence in this matter. Additionally, there was a request for clarification concerning the seizure of a Samsung J4 mobile phone, which is reportedly associated with the accused, Prajwal Revanna.
The prosecution argued that the phone was confiscated during the 'mahazar (spot inspection)' undertaken during the inquiry. However, the defense for Prajwal Revanna contended that the mobile device was not in his possession at the time of his arrest, thus lacking evidentiary significance. The court directed both counsels to present only clarifications without engaging in further debates.
This case stems from a rape complaint and other allegations made by a domestic worker from K.R. Nagar against Prajwal Revanna. The court has examined 26 pieces of evidence pertinent to the case.
During the Lok Sabha election period, videos purportedly showing Prajwal Revanna sexually assaulting women and recording the incidents emerged. After the elections, Prajwal left the country, following an initial police complaint filed by a victim from Holenarasipura. Upon returning to Bengaluru on May 31, 2024, he was apprehended by the Bengaluru Police.
His return was prompted by public appeals from his grandfather, H.D. Deve Gowda, and Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy.
Prajwal has remained in Bengaluru Central Jail for the past 14 months, with multiple bail applications consistently denied by all courts.
One of the controversial videos that sparked widespread outrage during the election period reportedly shows the sexual assault of an elderly domestic worker at a farmhouse in Holenarasipura. In this video, the woman is seen pleading with Prajwal, indicating that she had previously served food to his family.
The Special Investigation Team (SIT) has filed charges under IPC Sections 376(2)(n) (repeated rape on the same victim), 506 (criminal intimidation), 354A(1) (unwelcome physical contact and advances), 354B (criminal force intended to disrobe), 354C (voyeurism - capturing images of a woman engaged in a private act without consent), along with relevant sections of the Information Technology Act.
Point of View
It is essential to approach the unfolding events surrounding the Prajwal Revanna case with a neutral perspective. The legal proceedings highlight serious allegations that require thorough examination and due process. The involvement of a public figure adds complexity to the narrative, making it vital to maintain journalistic integrity and deliver accurate information to the public.
NationPress
31/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the charges against Prajwal Revanna?
Prajwal Revanna faces charges under IPC Sections 376(2)(n), 506, 354A(1), 354B, and 354C, along with relevant sections of the Information Technology Act.
When is the verdict expected?
The verdict in the case is scheduled to be announced on August 1.
What evidence is being considered in the case?
The court is reviewing 26 pieces of evidence, including video recordings and a seized mobile phone.
Why was the verdict postponed?
The court postponed the verdict to seek clarifications on certain evidentiary matters.
What has been the public response to the case?
The case has prompted significant public outrage, particularly due to the serious allegations and the nature of the evidence.
