Will the Verdict of the Malegaon Blast Case Finally Be Delivered After 17 Years?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Verdict announcement after 17 years.
- Involvement of high-profile accused.
- Significant legal implications expected.
- Decade-long trial with extensive witness examination.
- Case transferred from ATS to NIA.
New Delhi, July 31 (NationPress) After a lengthy wait spanning 17 years, a Special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court is poised to announce its verdict regarding the 2008 Malegaon blast case on Thursday.
The court had reserved its judgment on April 19, concluding hearings and final arguments from both the prosecution and defense.
Despite the hearings wrapping up in April, the court indicated that due to the extensive nature of the case—encompassing over 100,000 pages of evidence and documentation—more time is necessary to review all materials prior to issuing the verdict.
All accused individuals in this case have been mandated to appear in court on the day of the verdict, with the court warning that measures will be taken against any accused who fails to attend.
A total of seven individuals are on trial, including Lt Col Prasad Purohit, former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur, and retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay.
They face charges under various sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code (IPC). All accused are presently out on bail.
The blast occurred on September 29, 2008, in Malegaon, a town in Maharashtra known for its communal sensitivity, during the holy month of Ramzan and just before Navratri. The explosion resulted in six fatalities and over 100 injuries.
Throughout the decade-long trial, the prosecution examined 323 witnesses, of which 34 turned hostile.
Initially, the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) handled the investigation, but in 2011, it was transferred to the NIA.
In 2016, the NIA filed a charge sheet that absolved Pragya Singh Thakur and several other defendants, citing a lack of sufficient evidence. The forthcoming verdict, nearly 17 years after the tragedy, is highly anticipated and may have significant legal and political implications.