VHP's Surendra Jain on Ram Mandir theft case: 105-page SIT chargesheet filed

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
VHP's Surendra Jain on Ram Mandir theft case: 105-page SIT chargesheet filed

Synopsis

A 105-page SIT chargesheet in the Ram Mandir donation theft case has drawn a sharp political response — VHP's Surendra Jain says most allegations were lies, demands apologies from those who claimed ₹20,000 crore was looted, and warns critics not to use Lord Ram as an electoral weapon. The Supreme Court has acknowledged the SIT's work, but the investigation is still ongoing.

Key Takeaways

The SIT probing alleged financial irregularities at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi temple in Ayodhya filed a 105-page chargesheet in court.
VHP Joint General Secretary Surendra Jain said the Supreme Court expressed satisfaction with the SIT's report on 22 September 2026 .
Jain stated that most allegations against the temple — including claims of ₹20,000 crore being looted — were false and called on accusers to apologise.
BJP spokesperson Pratul Shah Deo confirmed thefts occurred but said the scale was minor, not in the billions.
The reconstituted SIT is led by Inspector General of Police Kiran S. , with two senior Ayodhya police officers as members.
The Supreme Court had directed Uttar Pradesh to reconstitute the SIT for a fair and speedy investigation.

Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) Joint General Secretary Surendra Jain on Tuesday, 22 September welcomed the submission of a 105-page chargesheet in court in the Ram Mandir donation theft case, stating that the SIT's work had exposed the falsity of most allegations. He also charged that certain individuals are exploiting the matter for political gain, alleging they are 'opposing Lord Ram for political reasons.'

SIT Chargesheet and Supreme Court's Observations

According to reports, the Supreme Court expressed satisfaction with the chargesheet report filed by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing alleged financial irregularities in donations and offerings at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi temple in Ayodhya. The Uttar Pradesh government had informed the apex court that the SIT had completed its investigation and would file the charge sheet within two days of that communication.

Jain noted that the Supreme Court also acknowledged that media reporting on certain valuable items had been inaccurate. 'Those items were safe too. Receipts of some of these items could not be obtained, but they are safe, and some of the receipts are under process,' Jain said.

VHP's Stance: Most Allegations Were False

Jain maintained that the bulk of the charges levelled against the temple trust were unfounded. 'It has been proved that most of the allegations were false. Mostly, they were outcomes of false information or were due to some vested interests,' he said, directly addressing those who claimed that ₹20,000 crore had been looted from temple coffers. 'All who claimed that 20,000 crores were looted have lied and sinned. They should apologise,' he added.

At the same time, Jain called for the public to continue engaging with the SIT. 'If some people still feel obligated or have queries, or if anything new comes in the case, then they must inform the SIT,' he said, acknowledging that the investigation remains ongoing and that genuine wrongdoers should face punishment.

Political Controversy and Warning to Critics

Jain reserved sharp words for those he accused of weaponising the case against religious sentiment. 'Please don't use God to push your agenda. The people of the nation won't forgive you,' he warned. He described it as a 'crime against Lord Ram' to make the issue a political tool, adding: 'Use any tool to win elections, but not this one. However, some things did indeed go wrong, and necessary actions will be taken on the same.'

BJP's Response to the Investigation

BJP spokesperson Pratul Shah Deo praised the SIT's efforts, describing the extent of the thefts as 'surprising' while cautioning against exaggerating their scale. 'The claim of billions of rupees being looted is wrong. The thefts are minor, but yes, stealing of such a nature is shameful and embarrassing,' Deo said. He expressed confidence that the SIT would secure punishment for the accused through the Supreme Court, adding that both the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh state government are remaining vigilant.

Reconstituted SIT Leading the Probe

The Supreme Court had earlier directed the Uttar Pradesh government to reconstitute the SIT for a fair, speedy, and thorough investigation. The reconstituted team is led by Inspector General of Police Kiran S., with Ayodhya Deputy Inspector General of Police Somen Verma and Ayodhya Senior Superintendent of Police Gaurav Grover as members. The development marks a significant step forward in a case that has attracted considerable national attention and political commentary since the allegations first surfaced.

Point of View

But the political battle around the Ram Mandir donation controversy is far from resolved. The VHP's aggressive framing — casting critics as enemies of Lord Ram rather than legitimate accountability voices — risks conflating religious sentiment with institutional oversight, which is precisely what erodes public trust in temple management. The Supreme Court's continued oversight signals that the judiciary is not satisfied with leaving this to political actors. The key unresolved question is whether the SIT's findings will lead to consequential convictions or become another spectacle that produces headlines but no lasting accountability.
NationPress
22 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Ram Mandir donation theft case?
The Ram Mandir donation theft case involves alleged financial irregularities in donations and offerings at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi temple in Ayodhya. The Supreme Court directed the Uttar Pradesh government to form an SIT to investigate, which has now filed a 105-page chargesheet in court.
What did the Supreme Court say about the SIT's chargesheet?
The Supreme Court expressed satisfaction with the report submitted by the SIT, according to VHP leader Surendra Jain. The court also acknowledged that some media reporting on certain valuable items at the temple had been inaccurate, and those items were reportedly found to be safe.
Who is leading the reconstituted SIT probing the Ayodhya temple case?
The reconstituted SIT is led by Inspector General of Police Kiran S., with Ayodhya Deputy Inspector General of Police Somen Verma and Ayodhya Senior Superintendent of Police Gaurav Grover as members. The Supreme Court had ordered the reconstitution to ensure a fair and speedy investigation.
Why did VHP's Surendra Jain say people should apologise?
Jain demanded apologies from those who claimed that ₹20,000 crore had been looted from the Ram Mandir, calling those allegations false and driven by vested interests. He said the SIT's investigation had proven that most charges were untrue.
What did BJP say about the Ram Mandir theft investigation?
BJP spokesperson Pratul Shah Deo said the thefts that occurred were real but minor in scale, dismissing claims of billions being looted as incorrect. He expressed confidence in the SIT and said both the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government are remaining vigilant in the matter.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 3 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google