Has WBSSC Extended the Application Deadline for Non-Teaching Recruitment?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Application Deadline Extended: New deadline is December 8.
- Legal Challenges: A petition has been filed against the recruitment process.
- Transparency Required: Full disclosure of 'tainted' staff is mandated by the court.
- Impact of Supreme Court Ruling: Recruitment is influenced by the annulment of the 2016 panel.
- Candidate Opportunities: Important for job seekers in the educational sector.
Kolkata, December 1 (NationPress) – The West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) has announced an extension for the application deadline concerning the recruitment of non-teaching personnel in Group-C and Group-D positions within state-operated schools in West Bengal.
The new deadline for submission has been set for December 8, a shift from the previous date of December 3.
This recruitment initiative aims to address vacancies created by the annulment of WBSSC's entire 2016 panel, which included approximately 26,000 positions, both teaching and non-teaching, following a ruling by a division bench of the Supreme Court earlier this April.
The announcement regarding the extended application period came shortly after two significant events unfolded at the Calcutta High Court concerning the hiring of non-teaching staff in the Group-C and Group-D categories.
Firstly, a new petition was submitted to the single-judge bench led by Justice Amrita Sinha, contesting the recruitment process for non-teaching roles in state-run schools.
Justice Sinha admitted the petition and scheduled an urgent hearing for Tuesday, coinciding with the previous deadline of December 3 for application submissions.
Subsequently, Justice Sinha ordered WBSSC to disclose the complete list of 7,293 “tainted” non-teaching staff from its 2016 panel, out of the 26,000 individuals affected by the Supreme Court's ruling.
This directive followed claims that while WBSSC had informed the Supreme Court of the 7,293 individuals being 'tainted'—having acquired their positions through monetary transactions—the commission only published a list of 3,512 names.
Given these allegations, Justice Sinha emphasized the importance of releasing the entire list of 7,293 'tainted' non-teaching staff in Group-C and Group-D categories from the 2016 panel.
The court further noted that making this list public was crucial to assess the implications of the new petition that challenges the recruitment process aimed at filling vacancies resulting from the Supreme Court's cancellation of the 2016 panel, which encompassed around 26,000 jobs in teaching and non-teaching roles.