Why Did the HC Question Bengal Police on FIR Not Filed as per Suvendu Adhikari's Complaint?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal development, Suvendu Adhikari challenges the West Bengal Police's failure to file an FIR based on a violent convoy attack. The Calcutta High Court's probing questions heighten the controversy around political accountability and police actions in West Bengal.
Key Takeaways
- Suvendu Adhikari raises critical questions about police accountability.
- The Calcutta High Court is actively involved in the inquiry process.
- Allegations of a cover-up by the West Bengal Police are serious and demand scrutiny.
- The political implications of this case could be significant in the upcoming elections.
- Public trust in law enforcement is at stake.
Kolkata, Sep 2 (NationPress) The Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari, has released a copy of an order from the Calcutta High Court's Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench, which inquired why the West Bengal Police had not registered an FIR concerning his complaint regarding the attack on his convoy in the Khagrabari area of Cooch Behar district on August 5.
Adhikari posted the order, issued by the Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench presided over by Justice Aniruddha Roy, on his official X handle on Tuesday.
In the order, the LoP noted that on Monday, Justice Roy interrogated the Inspector General (IG) of North Bengal about the lack of an FIR based on Adhikari’s complaint and questioned why the police were treating the suo motu complaint and Adhikari's complaint as identical.
In his social media statement, the BJP leader asserted that although he identified the West Bengal Minister responsible for North Bengal development, Udayan Guha, as the key orchestrator behind the attack on his convoy, the state government and West Bengal Police attempted to obscure the incident and shield Guha.
“A suo motu FIR was lodged by the police, which notably excluded Udayan Guha’s name. I will ensure the culprits face justice. With the assessment of the Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench of the Calcutta High Court, the police will now have to clarify why Udayan Guha’s name was omitted,” stated the LoP.
On August 6, the day following the assault on his convoy, Adhikari’s attorney submitted a complaint to the office of Cooch Behar District Police Superintendent Dyutiman Bhattacharya, naming 41 individuals, including Udayan Guha, as responsible for the attack.
Subsequently, Adhikari filed a writ petition at the Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench of the Calcutta High Court, where a comprehensive hearing took place on Monday.
Point of View
Coupled with the High Court's inquiry, highlight the need for a transparent investigation into such serious claims. As the situation unfolds, it is crucial that due process is upheld to restore public trust in the state's legal system.
NationPress
02/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the Calcutta High Court to question the Bengal Police?
The High Court questioned the Bengal Police regarding the absence of an FIR in response to Suvendu Adhikari's complaint about an attack on his convoy.
Who is Suvendu Adhikari?
Suvendu Adhikari is the Leader of Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly and a prominent BJP leader.
What was the nature of the attack on Adhikari's convoy?
The attack occurred on August 5 in the Khagrabari area of Cooch Behar district, leading to serious allegations against state officials.
Who did Adhikari accuse of masterminding the attack?
Adhikari named West Bengal Minister Udayan Guha as the principal mastermind behind the attack.
What actions has Adhikari taken following the attack?
Adhikari filed a complaint naming 41 individuals and later submitted a writ petition to the Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench demanding accountability.
