Was the Shoulder Touch Between Siraj and Duckett Really Accidental?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a heated match at Lord's, Mohammed Siraj's fine has sparked debate. Former England captain Michael Atherton defends Siraj, claiming the incident was accidental. With rising tensions and mixed reactions from players like Stuart Broad, this match is turning out to be more than just a game. Discover the insights behind this cricket controversy.
Key Takeaways
- Siraj's fine is a significant topic of discussion.
- Accidental contact highlighted by Atherton.
- Competitive spirit adds excitement to matches.
- Questions over the ICC's consistency in sanctions.
- Importance of sportsmanship in cricket.
London, July 14 (NationPress) Regarding Mohammed Siraj's fine for his send-off directed at opener Ben Duckett during the third Test at Lord’s, former England captain Michael Atherton stated that match referee Richie Richardson made the right choice in not penalizing the fast bowler for the shoulder contact, as it was completely unintentional.
On Monday, the International Cricket Council (ICC) announced that Siraj would forfeit 15 percent of his match fee due to his intense celebration in Duckett's face following his dismissal in the sixth over of the fourth day's play on Sunday.
Siraj also received one demerit point, marking his second infraction after previously earning a point in December 2024 for an incident involving Australia’s left-handed batsman Travis Head.
“There is a line, and no one wants to witness physical confrontations. For instance, when Virat Kohli altered his course to shoulder-charge young Sam Konstas this winter, that was unacceptable. It must be addressed.
“However, the brief shoulder contact from yesterday was entirely coincidental. Siraj attempted to sidestep. Duckett merely grazed him as he departed. The match referee acted correctly by not penalizing that shoulder bump and instead focusing on Siraj being in Duckett's face. In my view, this was an overreaction — 15 percent of his match fee and one demerit point is trivial. Let’s move forward,” Atherton remarked during a broadcast on Sky Sports.
There has been considerable tension between the two teams, characterized by verbal exchanges and fervent celebrations, which Atherton found entertaining. “I’ve relished the competitive spirit in this contest, and I believe the audience has too. I would much rather see players display too much passion than too little. Their commitment to representing their country is what matters most,” he added.
Stuart Broad, the former England paceman, challenged the ICC's decision against Siraj, questioning why Indian captain Shubman Gill escaped punishment after being caught on the stump mic using foul language towards Zak Crawley in the final over of day three.
“I find this absurd. Siraj receives a 15 percent fine for an aggressive celebration, while Gill swears live on television without consequence. It's either both should be penalized or neither. Players aren’t robots, but consistency is crucial,” Broad expressed on his account on ‘X’.
Point of View
It is crucial to approach this controversy with a balanced perspective. While Siraj's actions have drawn scrutiny, it's essential to recognize the competitive nature of cricket, where emotions run high. Our coverage aims to reflect the intricacies of sportsmanship, ensuring readers receive a comprehensive view of the unfolding events.
NationPress
14/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Siraj fined during the 3rd Test?
Mohammed Siraj was fined 15 percent of his match fee for an aggressive celebration following the dismissal of Ben Duckett. He was also penalized with a demerit point for this incident.
What did Michael Atherton say about the shoulder touch?
Michael Atherton defended Siraj, stating that the shoulder contact with Duckett was accidental and that the match referee's decision not to take action was correct.
What is the significance of the verbal exchanges in the match?
The verbal exchanges and passionate celebrations between the teams highlight the competitive spirit of the match, adding an exciting dimension to the ongoing contest.
What was Stuart Broad's reaction to the ICC's decision?
Stuart Broad criticized the ICC's sanction on Siraj, questioning the inconsistency of the penalties, especially in light of Shubman Gill's behavior that went unpunished.
How does the ICC handle player conduct?
The ICC evaluates player conduct based on the severity of incidents and the context, issuing fines and demerit points as deemed appropriate to maintain sportsmanship.
