Gavaskar: India carried away finding Hardik Pandya replacement

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Gavaskar: India carried away finding Hardik Pandya replacement

Synopsis

Sunil Gavaskar has cut through the noise around India's all-rounder search with a blunt verdict: Hardik Pandya is irreplaceable, so stop trying. His solution — four genuine bowlers, with Naman Dhir and Axar Patel filling flexible sixth-man roles — reframes the debate entirely ahead of India's busier T20I calendar.

Key Takeaways

Sunil Gavaskar said Hardik Pandya is 'irreplaceable' and India should stop hunting for a like-for-like substitute.
Gavaskar recommended India field at least four full-time bowlers in T20Is, with a fifth and sixth slot for all-rounders who can bat.
Naman Dhir hit three sixes off six balls in the rain-curtailed Bengaluru T20I , helping India post 118/5 in 7.4 overs .
The final T20I was called off after 46 balls , with the West Indies still without a bilateral series win in India since 2002 .
Mayank Yadav , Prince Yadav , and Naman Dhir all impressed during the series as India tested bench strength.

Cricket legend Sunil Gavaskar has observed that Team India sometimes get too caught up in the search for a like-for-like replacement for all-rounder Hardik Pandya, a pursuit he believes is fundamentally misguided. Speaking on JioStar while analysing the T20I series against the West Indies, Gavaskar argued that India should instead focus on building a balanced bowling attack and accept that Pandya's profile is simply irreplaceable.

The Series Backdrop

The West Indies' wait for a first bilateral series win in India since 2002 goes on, as the final T20I in Bengaluru was washed out after just 46 balls of the India innings. The truncated series did, however, serve as a useful audition for India's fringe players, with Mayank Yadav, Prince Yadav, and Naman Dhir all making cases for extended consideration.

Gavaskar's Key Advice on Bowling Balance

'We sometimes get a little bit carried away with trying to find a replacement for Hardik Pandya. Hardik Pandya is irreplaceable. If you can't find somebody of his calibre, then go with somebody who will do a slightly different job,' Gavaskar said.

He emphasised that India need at least four full-time bowlers in their T20I line-up, with a fifth and sixth slot reserved for all-rounders who can contribute with the bat. 'A fifth bowler and a sixth can be your all-rounders, somebody who can bat as well,' he noted. He cited Axar Patel — capable of bowling his full four overs — as the kind of option India should build around. Going too deep with batting, Gavaskar warned, inevitably weakens the bowling and is 'where you get beaten.'

Naman Dhir: The Tour's Standout Find

Naman Dhir emerged as arguably the most eye-catching performer of the series. In the rain-curtailed 9-over game in Bengaluru, Dhir smashed three sixes off just six balls, helping India reach 118/5 at the 7.4-over mark before rain halted proceedings. Prior to that explosive cameo, it had been his off-spin that had generated the stronger impression throughout the tour.

'Naman Dhir is doing that job. He's bowling his overs well, and look at the way he batted in this game. So, that is what India need to do because the moment you go with batting up to number eight, you weaken your bowling,' Gavaskar said.

The Broader Selection Challenge

Gavaskar's remarks reflect a wider debate within Indian cricket circles about how the team approaches the all-rounder conundrum. Hardik Pandya, at his best, offers genuine pace bowling capable of touching 140+ kmph alongside explosive lower-order hitting — a combination that no current candidate replicates. Rather than chasing that combination, Gavaskar advocates a pragmatic split: a specialist spinner like Axar Patel to anchor the bowling, and a batter-leaning all-rounder like Dhir to provide lower-order firepower. This recalibration, he suggests, is more sustainable for India's T20I structure going forward.

Point of View

And the continued auditions have cost India bowling balance in close games. The more honest question is whether the selectors have the courage to lock in Axar Patel as the designated four-over spinner-all-rounder and build the rest of the attack around full-time seamers, rather than hoping a hybrid option materialises. Naman Dhir's Bengaluru cameo was dazzling, but six balls is a sample size, not a scouting report — the real test will come when he bowls in a tight finish against a top-order that knows his variations.
NationPress
18 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Sunil Gavaskar say about finding a Hardik Pandya replacement?
Gavaskar said India sometimes get 'a little bit carried away' trying to find a replacement for Hardik Pandya, adding that Pandya is irreplaceable. He advised India to instead field someone who does a different job — like Naman Dhir or Axar Patel — rather than chase a like-for-like substitute.
Who did Gavaskar highlight as a potential solution to India's all-rounder problem?
Gavaskar pointed to Naman Dhir and Axar Patel as viable options. Dhir is primarily a batter who can contribute two or three overs, while Patel can bowl his full four overs — together, they represent a different but workable model for India's sixth bowling option.
What happened in the final T20I between India and the West Indies?
The final T20I in Bengaluru was called off due to rain after just 46 balls of India's innings, when India were 118/5 in 7.4 overs. The West Indies' wait for a bilateral series win in India therefore extends beyond 2002.
How did Naman Dhir perform in the T20I series against the West Indies?
Naman Dhir was the series' standout find, impressing with his off-spin throughout the tour before a blistering six-ball cameo in Bengaluru in which he hit three sixes. His batting firepower added a new dimension to India's lower-order options.
What bowling structure does Gavaskar recommend for India in T20Is?
Gavaskar recommends India play with at least four regular bowlers, reserving the fifth and sixth spots for batting all-rounders who can chip in with a few overs. He argues that going too deep with batting — beyond number seven or eight — weakens the bowling and ultimately costs India matches.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 days ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 7 months ago
  6. 8 months ago
  7. 10 months ago
  8. 10 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google