Did the Akali Dal Take Legal Action Against Police Over Election Interference?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Legal Action: SAD petitions High Court against SSP for alleged election interference.
- Democratic Rights: The petition stresses the importance of safeguarding electoral integrity.
- Evidence Unveiled: Audio recordings reveal directives to obstruct opposition candidates.
- Statewide Impact: Allegations suggest a broader scheme to favor a specific political party.
- Urgent Need: Calls for judicial safeguards highlight the importance of free elections.
Chandigarh, Dec 4 (NationPress) The Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) has approached the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking to file a FIR against Patiala Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Varun Sharma. The petition calls for his suspension following a viral virtual conference where he allegedly instructed the district police to obstruct SAD candidates from submitting their nomination papers for the upcoming Block Samiti and Zila Parishad elections.
The legal action was initiated after SAD president Sukhbir Badal unveiled the recording of the SSP, which allegedly contained directives aimed at preventing opposition candidates, particularly from SAD, from reaching the Returning Officer to file their nominations.
Badal emphasized that this situation represents an infringement on the democratic rights of citizens, attributing these actions to a systematic effort by the SSP to favor the Aam Aadmi Party. He noted that similar orders were purportedly issued to police statewide under government directives and urged the Election Commissioner to intervene, alongside approaching the High Court.
The court has since issued notices to both the state government and the state Election Commission, scheduled for review on Monday. The petition, categorized as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), was submitted by former legislator Daljit Singh Cheema, advocating for urgent legal measures to ensure free and fair elections for the Block Samitis and Zila Parishads set for December 14.
It was highlighted that the SSP allegedly coordinated a criminal conspiracy through the viral conference to intimidate opposition candidates, thereby obstructing their nomination submissions through various means of coercion.
The petition, prepared by the party’s legal head Arshdeep Kler, referenced critical audio snippets that indicated orders to detain rivals at homes or en route to essential offices on behalf of AAP legislators, alongside ensuring Returning Officers annulled candidacy entries, facilitating uncontested victories.
Claiming that the Patiala SSP was undermining peace in the region by establishing a “private militia,” the petition urged the deployment of Central Armed Police Forces (CRPF) or independent monitors until the elections and counting processes in Patiala district were concluded.