Why Did Amit Malviya Critique Bengal Govt's Ad on Jagannath Cultural Complex?

Synopsis
In a recent statement, Amit Malviya criticized the West Bengal government's designation of the Lord Jagannath temple. He claimed it undermines Hindu sentiments, suggesting political motives behind the controversial naming.
Key Takeaways
- Controversy over the temple's naming highlights political and religious sensitivities.
- Amit Malviya's critiques suggest underlying political motives.
- The temple’s construction reflects cultural significance.
Kolkata, May 1 (NationPress) BJP’s Information Technology Cell leader and the party’s central observer for West Bengal, Amit Malviya, expressed his concerns on Thursday regarding the West Bengal government's official designation of the Lord Jagannath temple in Digha, East Midnapore district, as the “Jagannath Dham Cultural Centre” in state documents.
In a statement shared on his official X account that morning, Malviya deemed the state government's promotional materials regarding the Digha temple, which is undeniably a cultural site, to be inappropriate.
He stated, “It is deeply disgraceful that the Mamata Banerjee government’s advertisements for the inauguration of the Jagannath Cultural Complex in Digha appeared to promote inappropriate content.”
Malviya further characterized these advertisements as an intentional affront to Hindu sentiments and a significant disrespect to the followers of Lord Jagannath.
“These actions demonstrate a lack of true devotion, motivated instead by regressive and cynical political agendas,” he remarked.
His post on X also showcased the advertisements.
The inauguration of the Digha temple, reportedly inspired by the revered Shree Jagannath Dham Temple in Puri, Odisha, took place with great fanfare on Wednesday, attended by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.
According to records from the West Bengal Housing Development Corporation (WBHIDCO), the entity responsible for the temple's construction, the temple has been labeled as the “Jagannath Dham Cultural Centre.”
Political analysts suggest this was a strategic move to sidestep controversies, as state governments typically should not engage directly with religious institutions.
Previously, disputes arose concerning the Digha temple when the Leader of Opposition in West Bengal, Suvendu Adhikari, questioned the Chief Minister's assertions that the Digha temple mirrors the iconic Puri Temple.
Adhikari urged the Chief Minister to clarify why the temple was named Jagannath Dham Cultural Centre and not Shree Jagannath Temple.
“The Chief Minister should immediately instruct that the name be changed from 'Jagannath Dham Cultural Centre' to 'Shree Jagannath Temple' in all related state documents,” he insisted.
“This name change should also reflect in the tenders and documents of WBHIDCO, responsible for the temple’s construction, funded by the state government’s treasury,” Adhikari asserted.