Why Did Bangladesh's National Consensus Commission Withdraw the NCC Proposal?

Click to start listening
Why Did Bangladesh's National Consensus Commission Withdraw the NCC Proposal?

Synopsis

In a significant political shift, Bangladesh's National Consensus Commission has retracted its NCC proposal, opting instead for a new institutional framework. This decision, influenced by political discussions, raises questions about the future of governance and reform in the nation. Will this new committee effectively address the political instability?

Key Takeaways

  • The National Consensus Commission has withdrawn its NCC proposal.
  • A new committee for constitutional appointments has been proposed.
  • Political parties are urged to cooperate for national stability.
  • The structure of the new committee will not include the President or Chief Justice.
  • This decision reflects ongoing political negotiations in Bangladesh.

Dhaka, June 25 (NationPress) The National Consensus Commission of Bangladesh has officially retracted its plan to establish a National Constitutional Council (NCC), instead proposing the creation of a 'Constitutional and Statutory Institution Appointments Committee', as reported by local media.

This announcement was made by Vice-Chairman Ali Riaz following discussions with political parties at the Foreign Service Academy in Dhaka.

Riaz emphasized that the decision to abandon the NCC proposal was made in response to the preferences of various political entities.

Sources indicate that the new committee's structure will not involve the President or Chief Justice.

The suggested committee will comprise seven members, with the Speaker of the Lower House serving as its Chairman.

Members will include the Prime Minister, the Speaker of the Lower House, the Speaker of the Upper House, the Leader of the Opposition, a representative from opposition parties other than the main opposition, a legal representative of the President, and a judge from the Appellate Division nominated by the Chief Justice.

The original NCC proposal faced opposition from the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), which argued that it would diminish the powers of the executive.

“The NCC was intended to wield significant constitutional authority, yet it lacked accountability. As a democratic party, we cannot support an institution that holds power without accountability. Establishing such a separate body will disrupt the balance,” quoted Salahuddin Ahmed, a member of the BNP standing committee, in leading Bengali daily Prothom Alo.

On the other hand, the radical Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami backed the NCC but suggested excluding the President and Chief Justice from the council. Other parties also proposed alternative names and structures for the NCC.

Riaz further urged political parties to adopt a flexible approach regarding reform matters, stressing that such collaboration would benefit the nation.

“Let us focus on advancing together for the sake of the state and the nation. I have repeatedly stated that compromises must be made,” he remarked.

Last week marked the beginning of the second phase of talks between political parties and the National Consensus Commission amid ongoing political uncertainty in Bangladesh.

The latest discussions sought to finalize recommendations from various reform commissions established by the interim government and draft the July Charter. The talks concentrated on continuing the unfinished recommendations from the first round, as reported by local media.

Earlier this month, Muhammad Yunus led a National Consensus Commission meeting, where political leaders acknowledged the urgent need for timely elections.

The absence of a clear reform roadmap and election schedule has exacerbated political unrest in Bangladesh, with leaders from multiple parties questioning the controversial policies and performance of Yunus’s advisors.

As pressure mounted, Yunus had previously expressed frustration over his position, indicating a desire to resign, which has stirred considerable discussion within political circles.

Point of View

I recognize the complexities of Bangladesh's political landscape. The National Consensus Commission's decision to withdraw the NCC proposal reflects an evolving dialogue among key political players. It's crucial to prioritize collaboration for the nation's stability and democratic integrity. Our commitment to an inclusive approach will ensure that all voices are heard in shaping the future of governance.
NationPress
25/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the National Consensus Commission?
The National Consensus Commission is a body in Bangladesh tasked with fostering dialogue and consensus among political parties on governance and constitutional reforms.
Why was the NCC proposal withdrawn?
The NCC proposal was withdrawn due to opposition from political parties, particularly the BNP, which expressed concerns over its potential to undermine executive authority.
What is the new committee proposed?
The new committee, termed the 'Constitutional and Statutory Institution Appointments Committee', aims to facilitate appointments within constitutional institutions without the involvement of the President and Chief Justice.
What are the implications of this decision?
This decision may lead to a more collaborative approach among political parties, potentially easing political tensions and fostering a more stable governance environment.
Who are the key players involved in this decision?
Key players include Vice-Chairman Ali Riaz, the BNP, and other political representatives involved in discussions at the Foreign Service Academy in Dhaka.