Is BJP Right to Demand Law Amid the Hijab Controversy?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- BJP's demand for a law against face coverings during government procedures.
- RJD's defense of women's rights and constitutional protections.
- Political tensions between parties escalating over religious freedoms.
- Calls for unity against divisive forces in society.
- Importance of transparency in government appointments.
Patna, Dec 19 (NationPress) In light of the ongoing hijab controversy, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and former MLA Hari Bhushan Thakur Bachol has vocally supported Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, asserting that the Chief Minister's actions are justified.
During a media briefing, Bachol remarked that it is unacceptable to engage in government processes while obscuring one's identity in public settings.
He emphasized that individuals must be identifiable when undergoing government appointments, particularly for roles such as doctors, to maintain transparency and prevent impersonation.
Bachol also called for legislation to ban face coverings during official government procedures.
He accused certain groups of intentionally inciting this controversy and claimed that the Chief Minister is being unjustly targeted through legal actions.
“Nitish Kumar has committed no offense. Masks in public should not be permitted,” Bachol stated, asserting that individuals with a so-called “jihadi mentality” are threatening the Chief Minister, including from abroad, and such intimidation is intolerable.
Previously, Union Minister Giriraj Singh also backed the Chief Minister's stance.
Singh argued that candidates should reveal their faces when receiving appointment letters, drawing comparisons to identity checks required for passports and airport security.
He affirmed that the rule of law prevails in India and that the Chief Minister has made no errors.
Simultaneously, Dr Nikhil Anand, National General Secretary of the BJP OBC Morcha, insisted that both the Government of India and the Bihar government ensure that no individual, regardless of gender, can take exams, receive appointment letters, or engage in educational or occupational activities without visibly showing their face.
He proposed mandatory video documentation of candidates during exams, the distribution of appointment letters, and identity verification.
He issued a warning to those threatening Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, stating that radical and anti-national elements will not be tolerated.
He characterized Nitish Kumar as a leader for Dalit, Mahadalit, backward, and extremely backward communities and called for unity against what he termed divisive forces.
In contrast, RJD state spokesperson Ejaz Ahmed criticized the rhetoric of BJP leaders, including Union Minister Giriraj Singh, as wholly inappropriate, especially concerning a woman's dignity and honor.
“When the Chief Minister removed the hijab, Health Minister Mangal Pandey and other officials present appeared to smile, which deeply hurt the woman involved. The right to wear a hijab, purdah, or veil is safeguarded by the Indian Constitution, which guarantees religious freedom and the right to observe religious customs,” Ahmed stated.
He added that such comments exacerbate social discord and are unforgivable.
As political responses continue to emerge, this incident has ignited a broader discussion on personal identity, religious liberties, and appropriate conduct during official government functions.