Karnataka Assembly disrupted over tribal welfare scam, BJP-JD-S demand Nagendra's exit

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Karnataka Assembly disrupted over tribal welfare scam, BJP-JD-S demand Nagendra's exit

Synopsis

Karnataka's Assembly session collapsed into chaos on 18 August as BJP and JD-S opposition members, armed with a CBI chargesheet, demanded Minister B. Nagendra's ouster over the tribal welfare corporation scam — while the ruling Congress accused them of legislative misconduct. With the MUDA controversy also surfacing, the session exposed multiple simultaneous pressure points threatening the Siddaramaiah government.

Key Takeaways

BJP and JD-S members disrupted the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on 18 August , demanding the resignation of Minister B.
Opposition leader R.
Ashoka displayed the CBI chargesheet filed against Nagendra on the Assembly floor.
Opposition alleged funds were transferred to around 600 bank accounts in the tribal welfare corporation scam.
Minister Krishna Byre Gowda accused the opposition of 'goondaism' inside the legislature.
MUDA slogans targeting former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah also erupted, widening the political flashpoints.
Patil adjourned the House after repeated disruptions.

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Janata Dal (Secular) (JD-S) members brought the Karnataka Legislative Assembly to a standstill on Tuesday, 18 August, demanding the resignation of Minister B. Nagendra over his alleged role in the tribal welfare corporation scam. Opposition members, draped in black shawls, raised slogans against the ruling Congress government and disrupted proceedings throughout the session.

Opposition's Core Demands

Leader of the Opposition R. Ashoka held up a copy of the CBI chargesheet filed against Nagendra and others, pressing the government to remove him from the Cabinet. Ashoka questioned how funds had allegedly been transferred to around 600 bank accounts, demanding accountability from the Treasury benches. Opposition members repeatedly raised the slogan 'Where did the Dalit money go?' and alleged — without providing evidence on the floor — that funds had reached Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's residence, a charge the government did not directly address during the session.

Government's Response

Minister for Bengaluru Development Krishna Byre Gowda condemned the protest, saying the opposition had crossed the limits of legislative conduct and violated members' rights. 'Their slogans and statements should not go on record. The session is becoming a playground for their goondaism,' Gowda said. Home, IT and BT Minister Priyank Kharge challenged the opposition's tactics, asserting that the government was prepared to respond to every question raised. 'We are ready to answer questions. Why are you not allowing the session to function?' Kharge asked.

Heated Exchanges on the Floor

The session descended into a series of verbal duels. Municipal Administration Minister H.C. Balakrishna and Ashoka clashed directly, with Ashoka questioning Balakrishna's political standing. Kharge also hit back, saying the government did not need lessons from those who had allegedly 'burgled the temple's money.' When Urban Development Minister Yathindra Siddaramaiah rose to criticise the BJP, opposition members immediately countered with 'MUDA' slogans — a reference to the Mysuru Urban Development Authority controversy involving Yathindra's father, former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah.

Speaker's Intervention and Adjournment

Speaker G.S. Patil attempted to steer the House toward a discussion on the drought situation under Rule 69, as proposed by JD-S MLA H.D. Revanna and others. Ashoka objected, saying no such discussion had been sought at that point. JD-S floor leader C.B. Suresh Babu urged the Speaker to first restore order before taking up any scheduled business. With protests and counter-protests continuing unabated, Speaker Patil adjourned the House amid the chaos. This is the latest in a series of Assembly disruptions that have marked the ongoing session, with the tribal welfare scam remaining the opposition's primary pressure point against the Siddaramaiah-led government.

Point of View

Handing the BJP-JD-S combine a ready-made session narrative. Notably, the eruption of MUDA slogans the moment Yathindra Siddaramaiah spoke signals that the opposition is deliberately keeping multiple controversies active simultaneously, stretching the government's crisis management. The real casualty is legislative business: drought relief discussions, which affect millions of Karnataka farmers, were crowded out by political theatre.
NationPress
18 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Karnataka tribal welfare corporation scam?
The tribal welfare corporation scam involves allegations of financial irregularities, including the transfer of funds to around 600 bank accounts, linked to Minister B. Nagendra. The CBI has filed a chargesheet against Nagendra and others in connection with the case.
Why are BJP and JD-S demanding B. Nagendra's resignation?
The opposition is demanding Nagendra's exit from the Cabinet because a CBI chargesheet has been filed against him in the tribal welfare corporation scam. Opposition leader R. Ashoka displayed the chargesheet on the Assembly floor, arguing that a minister facing such charges cannot continue in office.
How did the Congress government respond to the protests?
Ministers Krishna Byre Gowda and Priyank Kharge condemned the disruptions, with Gowda calling the opposition's conduct 'goondaism' inside the legislature. Kharge said the government was ready to answer all questions but accused the BJP of not allowing the session to function.
What is the MUDA controversy referred to during the session?
MUDA refers to the Mysuru Urban Development Authority controversy involving former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. Opposition members raised MUDA slogans when Siddaramaiah's son, Urban Development Minister Yathindra Siddaramaiah, rose to speak, using it as a counter-pressure point against the ruling party.
What happened to the scheduled Assembly business?
Speaker G.S. Patil attempted to move to a drought situation discussion under Rule 69, but the opposition objected. With protests continuing, the Speaker adjourned the House without completing the scheduled legislative business.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 6 hours ago
  2. Yesterday
  3. 1 week ago
  4. 1 week ago
  5. 2 weeks ago
  6. 2 weeks ago
  7. 6 months ago
  8. 6 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google