Did BJP Chief Nadda Just Expose Congress's Desperation?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a pivotal ruling, the Supreme Court has upheld the Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's electoral rolls, a decision viewed by the BJP as a decisive blow to Congress. BJP President JP Nadda criticizes Congress for its desperate attempts to thwart the process, branding their reactions as 'hollow celebrations'. Discover the implications of this ruling.
Key Takeaways
- Supreme Court upheld the SIR in Bihar.
- BJP views ruling as a significant setback for Congress.
- Transparency measures include searchable deletion lists.
- No complaints were filed by RJD-Congress agents.
- Aadhaar can be used for identity verification.
New Delhi, Aug 14 (NationPress) The Supreme Court today dismissed the request to pause the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar’s electoral rolls, a decision the BJP views as a significant setback for Congress, which had employed various tactics to obstruct the process.
Instead, the Court instructed the Election Commission to publish a searchable list of the 6.5 million deleted names, provide justifications for each deletion, widely disseminate the list, and permit Aadhaar for identity verification.
BJP National President JP Nadda criticized Congress's ‘hollow celebrations’, stating: “Congress attempted every trick and deceit to thwart the SIR but faced disappointment in the Supreme Court today. In sheer desperation, Congress is grasping at non-issues and presenting them as 'moral victories'. The reality is that their fabrications are being systematically dismantled and defeated. Congress has once again lost both the case and the narrative.”
The BJP asserts that the Opposition’s underlying objective—to hinder the SIR and protect fraudulent entries in the voter list—has failed. The Court's ruling allows the revision process to proceed. The procedural directives merely guarantee transparency and do not endorse Congress’s unfounded claims, according to the party.
The Election Commission of India has stated that no RJD–Congress booth-level agent has lodged any complaints. All parties were granted access to the list of 6.5 million deleted voters, yet they are now feigning outrage for the media, it added.
Regarding Aadhaar, the Supreme Court clarified that it is intended for identity verification, not citizenship verification. This counters the Opposition's alarmist rhetoric. The BJP claims that in their desperation, Congress is spinning around a verdict that has unveiled their deception—and affirmed what the BJP has consistently maintained: the process is clean, lawful, and transparent. The words of JP Nadda encapsulate the situation perfectly—Congress has lost the case and lost their narrative, according to political analysts.
Point of View
It is essential to recognize the significance of the Supreme Court's ruling on the Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's electoral rolls. This decision not only reinforces the electoral process's integrity but also highlights the ongoing political maneuvering between parties. It is vital to inform the public based on factual developments while maintaining journalistic neutrality.
NationPress
20/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is a process aimed at updating and revising the electoral rolls to ensure that they accurately reflect the eligible voters.
What did the Supreme Court decide regarding the SIR?
The Supreme Court refused to halt the SIR, allowing the process to continue while ordering the publication of a searchable list of deleted names.
What was BJP's reaction to the Supreme Court's decision?
BJP President JP Nadda expressed that the ruling is a significant victory for the party and a setback for Congress, accusing them of attempting to obstruct the process.
How does the SIR impact voters?
The SIR aims to remove fraudulent entries and ensure that the electoral rolls are accurate, thus safeguarding the integrity of the voting process.
What does the use of Aadhaar for identity verification mean?
The Supreme Court clarified that Aadhaar can be used to establish identity during the electoral process, not to determine citizenship.
