Have Offending Portions Been Removed from 'Udaipur Files'?

Click to start listening
Have Offending Portions Been Removed from 'Udaipur Files'?

Synopsis

The CBFC has assured the Delhi High Court that the contentious elements of 'Udaipur Files' have been excised. This film, tied to the Kanhaiya Lal murder case, is set for a global release this Friday amidst legal and communal tensions.

Key Takeaways

  • The CBFC has removed controversial segments from 'Udaipur Files.'
  • Legal challenges are ongoing regarding the film's release.
  • The film is linked to the highly publicized Kanhaiya Lal murder case.
  • Concerns about communal harmony have been raised by various parties.
  • The film's trailer has drawn significant criticism.

New Delhi, July 9 (NationPress) The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) informed the Delhi High Court on Wednesday that the disputed segments of the film 'Udaipur Files' have been excised.

A panel comprising Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Anish Daya was examining multiple petitions, including one from Maulana Arshad Madani, leader of the Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, which sought to prevent the film's release related to the Kanhaiya Lal murder case.

This film, which is set to debut globally this Friday, centers on the horrific murder of Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor from Udaipur, Rajasthan, who was killed in June 2022 by Mohammad Riyaz Attari and Ghaus Mohammad in a brutal act.

During the proceedings, the bench noted Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Chetan Sharma's remarks that prior to certification, the CBFC suggested specific cuts, which the film's producer has complied with.

Additionally, the Delhi High Court requested the film's producer to arrange a private viewing of the film and its trailer for the legal representatives involved in the case on the same day.

The court is scheduled to examine the petitions further on Thursday (July 10).

Maulana Arshad Madani's petition argued that the release of 'Udaipur Files' could ignite communal strife and disrupt public order, threatening the nation's religious harmony.

The petition aimed to annul the CBFC certification for the film, alleging a breach of Section 5B of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and the Certification Guidelines for Films.

According to the petition, the film's trailer, which premiered on June 26 on YouTube, contains dialogues and scenes that could provoke communal unrest, echoing recent tensions.

“The trailer features dialogues and narrative components that clearly qualify as hate speech against a specific community in the country, with language and imagery that are both incendiary and overtly communal,” it stated.

Allegedly, the film also directly references a controversial statement made by politician Nupur Sharma, which incited communal violence and the tragic murder of Kanhaiya Lal.

The petition emphasized that the trailer, and consequently the film, replicates the content that previously led to significant tensions and various FIRs against Nupur Sharma.

Point of View

It is crucial to remain unbiased while reporting on sensitive issues like those presented in 'Udaipur Files.' The film's release raises significant questions about freedom of expression and the potential for societal discord. Striking a balance between artistic freedom and communal harmony is essential in our diverse nation.
NationPress
17/07/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the premise of 'Udaipur Files'?
The film revolves around the gruesome murder of Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor in Udaipur, Rajasthan, and its broader implications on communal relations.
Why was the film challenged in court?
The film was challenged due to concerns that its release could incite communal tensions and disrupt public order.
What actions did the CBFC take regarding the film?
The CBFC advised cuts to the film that have now been implemented by the producer before its certification.
When is 'Udaipur Files' scheduled for release?
The film is set to release globally this Friday.
What is the significance of the trailer's content?
The trailer has been criticized for containing dialogues that may incite communal discord, raising legal and ethical questions.