Complaint filed against KPCC chief Hariprasad over 'Umar Khalid nationalist' remark

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Complaint filed against KPCC chief Hariprasad over 'Umar Khalid nationalist' remark

Synopsis

Karnataka Congress chief B.K. Hariprasad's decision to call UAPA-accused Umar Khalid a 'nationalist' — inside the Vidhana Soudha — has drawn a formal police complaint and a threat of court action. The episode puts the ruling Congress in Karnataka on the defensive and hands the BJP and ABVP a sharp political weapon ahead of an already contentious political season.

Key Takeaways

Hindu activist Tejas Gowda filed a complaint on 16 September at Vidhana Soudha police station, Bengaluru against KPCC President B.K.
Hariprasad had called Umar Khalid a 'nationalist' and said ABVP had 'no moral right' to speak on Khalid, citing the organisation's alleged admiration for Nathuram Godse .
Umar Khalid is currently in custody under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots case.
Gowda alleged the remarks were aimed at spreading hatred and demanded registration of a criminal case.
Police reportedly informed Gowda the complaint would be registered; he has warned of court action if an FIR is not filed.

A Hindu activist on Wednesday, 16 September filed a formal complaint at the Vidhana Soudha police station in Bengaluru against Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) President B.K. Hariprasad over his remarks describing jailed activist Umar Khalid as a 'nationalist' and questioning the standing of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) to comment on him. The complainant, Tejas Gowda, alleged the remarks were aimed at spreading hatred and urged police to register a criminal case against the Congress leader.

What Hariprasad Said

The controversy stems from remarks Hariprasad made on Tuesday, a day before the complaint was filed, in which he defended Umar Khalid before reporters inside the Vidhana Soudha premises. 'Umar Khalid is a nationalist, and ABVP has no right to speak on Umar Khalid because ABVP adores Nathuram Godse — who was an anti-national and the first terrorist of the country. They have no moral right or moral ethics to speak on Umar Khalid,' Hariprasad told reporters in Bengaluru. He also described Khalid's detractors as individuals with 'no morals and ethics.'

The Complaint and Allegations

Speaking to the media after filing the complaint, Gowda alleged that Hariprasad's remarks — made within the precincts of the Vidhana Soudha, Karnataka's seat of legislative power — amounted to an insult to Indian citizens. 'As the Karnataka Congress President, he is glorifying a terrorist and has exposed his mindset and thinking before everyone,' Gowda alleged.

Gowda pointed to Umar Khalid's arrest under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots case, and claimed that courts had rejected his bail applications. He argued that describing Khalid as a 'nationalist' under these circumstances was legally objectionable. 'Delhi riots case accused Umar Khalid, who was arrested under the UAPA, is a nationalist for Hariprasad. This raises questions about the Karnataka Congress President and the party's policy,' Gowda said.

Police Response and Next Steps

According to Gowda, police officials at the Vidhana Soudha police station informed him that his complaint would be registered. He warned that if an FIR was not filed, he would approach the court and seek judicial directions for registration of the case.

Political Context

This comes amid an already charged political atmosphere in Karnataka, where the ruling Congress government under Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has faced sustained pressure from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and affiliated organisations over a range of law-and-order and ideological issues. Notably, Hariprasad's remarks were made a day after he had already defended his position publicly, suggesting a deliberate stance rather than an off-the-cuff comment. The ABVP, the student wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), has been a vocal critic of Umar Khalid, making Hariprasad's counter-attack on the organisation's moral authority a pointed political move. How the police proceed with the complaint — and whether the Congress leadership distances itself from or doubles down on Hariprasad's remarks — will shape the next phase of this controversy.

Point of View

Making this a conscious political gambit by the Karnataka Congress. The strategy appears to be to reframe the Umar Khalid debate around ABVP's own ideological associations, particularly with Nathuram Godse, rather than defend Khalid's legal status directly. It is a high-risk move: while it may energise a section of the Congress base, it hands the BJP and ABVP a visceral campaign line in a state where communal polarisation has been a live electoral variable. Whether the Congress high command endorses or quietly distances itself from Hariprasad's framing will signal how far the party is willing to push this particular front.
NationPress
16 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did KPCC President B.K. Hariprasad say about Umar Khalid?
Hariprasad called Umar Khalid a 'nationalist' and said the ABVP had no moral right to speak on Khalid, alleging the organisation 'adores Nathuram Godse.' He made these remarks to reporters in Bengaluru on Tuesday, 15 September, and repeated the position the following day.
Who filed the complaint against Hariprasad and where?
Hindu activist Tejas Gowda filed the complaint on 16 September at the Vidhana Soudha police station in Bengaluru. He alleged the remarks were objectionable and sought registration of a criminal case against the Congress leader.
Why is Umar Khalid in custody?
Umar Khalid was arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots case. According to the complainant, courts have rejected his bail applications, though this claim has not been independently verified in this report.
What happens if police do not register an FIR?
Tejas Gowda has warned that if police fail to register an FIR based on his complaint, he will approach the court and seek judicial directions for registration of the case. Police officials reportedly informed him the complaint would be registered.
What is the political significance of the ABVP reference in Hariprasad's remarks?
By invoking ABVP's alleged association with Nathuram Godse, Hariprasad sought to question the organisation's moral authority to criticise Umar Khalid. The ABVP is the student wing of the RSS, and the remarks amount to a direct ideological counter-attack rather than a straightforward defence of Khalid's legal situation.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 hours ago
  2. 7 hours ago
  3. Yesterday
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google