Darshan, wife move SC against approver status granted to Pradosh in Renukaswamy murder case

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Darshan, wife move SC against approver status granted to Pradosh in Renukaswamy murder case

Synopsis

Kannada actor Darshan and his wife Vijayalakshmi have taken their legal fight over co-accused Pradosh Rao's approver status all the way to the Supreme Court, even as Pradosh's in-camera testimony continues before the trial court. With three petitions now pending at the apex court, the outcome could significantly alter the course of one of Karnataka's most high-profile murder trials in recent years.

Key Takeaways

Actor Darshan filed two petitions before the Supreme Court challenging the Karnataka High Court's order on approver status in the Renukaswamy murder case .
His wife Vijayalakshmi has also approached the apex court, bringing the total to three petitions now pending before the Supreme Court.
Senior advocate Hashmat Pasha filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) seeking a stay on proceedings concerning Pradosh Rao's statement.
Pradosh Rao's statement was recorded in-camera for nearly three hours on Monday, with proceedings adjourned to Tuesday.
The case concerns the alleged killing of 35-year-old Renukaswamy in Bengaluru in June 2024 ; his body was found in the Kamakshipalya area.
The three Supreme Court petitions are expected to come up for consideration this week .

Kannada actor Darshan has filed two petitions before the Supreme Court challenging the Karnataka High Court's order in the Renukaswamy murder case, contesting the grant of approver status to co-accused Pradosh Rao. His wife Vijayalakshmi has separately approached the apex court in connection with the same proceedings, bringing the total number of petitions before the Supreme Court to three. The petitions are likely to come up for consideration this week.

What Darshan Has Challenged

In his petition, Darshan has contended that a co-accused's statement need not be heard before a decision is taken on approver status, and has questioned the procedure adopted in granting Pradosh Rao that designation. The Karnataka High Court had previously upheld the trial court's order granting Pradosh approver status, following which Darshan's legal team escalated the matter to the Supreme Court.

Senior advocate Hashmat Pasha, appearing for Darshan, filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court seeking a stay on proceedings concerning Pradosh's statement. 'We had approached the trial court challenging Pradosh being made an approver. However, as the trial court did not accept our plea, we have filed an SLP before the Supreme Court,' Pasha said.

Pradosh's Statement Being Recorded

The development comes as the trial court is actively recording the statement of Pradosh Rao, who has turned approver and is also listed as a prosecution witness in the case. His statement was recorded for nearly three hours before the court on Monday, with proceedings held in-camera. The matter was adjourned to Tuesday for continued recording of his testimony. The prosecution has relied on his statement in connection with the alleged events leading to Renukaswamy's killing.

Background: The Renukaswamy Murder Case

The case concerns the alleged killing of 35-year-old Renukaswamy, a fan of actor Darshan, in Bengaluru in June 2024. According to the prosecution, Renukaswamy was allegedly abducted, assaulted, and killed, with his body later found in the Kamakshipalya area of the city. Darshan and several others were subsequently arrested and are currently facing trial.

The prosecution has alleged that Renukaswamy was targeted after he reportedly sent vulgar messages to Darshan's partner, Pavithra Gowda. Notably, the case has drawn sustained public attention given Darshan's prominent status in the Kannada film industry.

What Happens Next

With three petitions now pending before the Supreme Court, the apex court's decision on the challenge to Pradosh's approver status could have a significant bearing on the trial's trajectory. If the court grants a stay on the recording of Pradosh's statement, it could delay proceedings considerably. The outcome of this legal challenge is being closely watched by both the defence and prosecution.

Point of View

The trial could stall indefinitely. What this legal manoeuvre also signals is that the defence considers Pradosh's in-camera statement potentially damaging enough to be worth the optics of a Supreme Court intervention. The Renukaswamy case is already a mirror on the culture of celebrity impunity — how the apex court responds to this procedural challenge will be watched far beyond Karnataka's film circles.
NationPress
29 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has actor Darshan approached the Supreme Court in the Renukaswamy murder case?
Darshan has filed two petitions before the Supreme Court challenging the Karnataka High Court's order that upheld the grant of approver status to co-accused Pradosh Rao. He has contested the procedure adopted in making Pradosh an approver and argued that a co-accused's statement need not be heard before such a decision is taken.
Who is Pradosh Rao and why is his approver status significant?
Pradosh Rao is a co-accused in the Renukaswamy murder case who has turned approver, meaning he has agreed to testify for the prosecution in exchange for a pardon. His statement is considered central to the prosecution's case, as it allegedly details the events leading to Renukaswamy's killing.
What is the Renukaswamy murder case about?
The case concerns the alleged killing of 35-year-old Renukaswamy, a fan of Kannada actor Darshan, in Bengaluru in June 2024. According to the prosecution, Renukaswamy was abducted, assaulted, and killed, with his body found in the Kamakshipalya area. The prosecution has alleged he was targeted after sending vulgar messages to Darshan's partner, Pavithra Gowda.
What has Darshan's wife Vijayalakshmi filed before the Supreme Court?
Vijayalakshmi has separately approached the Supreme Court in connection with the Renukaswamy murder case proceedings. Together with Darshan's two petitions, three petitions in total are now pending before the apex court and are expected to come up for hearing this week.
What could a Supreme Court stay on the proceedings mean for the trial?
If the Supreme Court grants a stay on the recording of Pradosh Rao's statement, trial proceedings could be significantly delayed, as his testimony is a key plank of the prosecution's case. The apex court's decision on the challenge to his approver status is expected to have a direct bearing on the trial's overall timeline.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 hour ago
  2. 5 days ago
  3. 4 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google