Delhi Court Requests CBI's Reaction to Rabri Devi's Petition for IRCTC Scam Case Transfer?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Delhi court seeks CBI response on transfer plea.
- Rabri Devi alleges bias from Judge Gogne.
- Case involves serious corruption allegations.
- Potential implications for ongoing trials.
- ED is prosecuting under PMLA.
New Delhi, Nov 26 (NationPress) On Wednesday, a court in Delhi called for a response from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) regarding a petition from former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi. She is requesting that the IRCTC scam case be reassigned from Special Judge Vishal Gogne to another judge.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (PC Act) at the Rouse Avenue Courts issued a notice to the CBI, mandating the agency to submit its reply by December 6.
Rabri Devi has submitted requests for the transfer of four ongoing cases overseen by Special Judge Gogne, including the IRCTC scam case, the cash-for-jobs matter, and related money laundering investigations led by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
However, notice was only issued for the IRCTC scam case on Wednesday, as Principal District and Sessions Judge Dinesh Bhatt noted that essential parties were not included in the transfer petitions concerning the other three issues, which involve quid pro quo land transfers and money laundering cases linked to RJD supremo Lalu Prasad Yadav, Rabri Devi, Tejashwi Yadav, and others.
In her petition, Rabri Devi contends that there is a bias on the part of Special Judge Gogne, asserting that his behavior during hearings has fostered a "reasonable apprehension of bias" in her perspective.
"The conduct of the Ld. Special Judge, at various points in the proceedings across all the aforementioned cases, appears to exhibit undue favoritism toward the prosecution and bias, which can be observed from multiple instances in the case proceedings/orders themselves," the transfer petition declares. She insists that her concerns are based on "specific instances" rather than "speculation or imagination."
Hence, she has requested that the cases be transferred "in the interest of justice, equity, and fair play."
On October 13, Judge Gogne issued orders to frame charges under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, along with provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act in the IRCTC hotel scam case, setting the stage for trial.
The CBI claims that the alleged scam occurred between 2004 and 2009, during Lalu Prasad's tenure as Union Railway Minister, involving the leasing of IRCTC hotels against regulations in return for premium land in Patna, purportedly transferred to his family members or associated entities.
In a separate cash-for-jobs investigation, the CBI asserts that individuals vying for Group D positions in the Railways transferred land to Lalu Prasad's family or proxy companies in exchange for employment.
The ED is also prosecuting the family under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for alleged laundering of proceeds from these transactions.