Will the Delhi HC Hear the Plea Against 'The Taj Story'?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
New Delhi, Oct 29 (NationPress) The Delhi High Court has declined to provide an urgent hearing regarding a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) opposing the anticipated film 'The Taj Story', which is scheduled for release on October 31, 2025.
The petition aims to prevent the film’s release and requests a review of its certification by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), arguing that it misrepresents historical facts concerning the Taj Mahal and may disrupt communal harmony.
Filed by advocate Shakeel Abbas, the PIL names several respondents, including the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the CBFC, as well as the film’s producer, director, writer, and actor Paresh Rawal.
The petitioner asserts that the film disseminates “misleading and manipulated information” about one of India’s most celebrated monuments, the Taj Mahal, and endorses a biased political narrative.
According to the plea, “The Taj Story” presents a skewed version of history, aiming to promote a particular political agenda.
The petitioner warns that such portrayals could “inflame religious sentiments and disrupt public order.”
The plea also highlights a trend of politically charged films, citing 'The Kashmir Files' and 'The Bengal Files' as examples of productions that have allegedly fostered divisive discourse.
The trailer for 'The Taj Story' was released on October 16, 2025, generating significant attention and criticism for its controversial interpretation of historical events.
Despite this, the CBFC reportedly permitted the trailer’s release without thorough examination.
The petition requested the High Court to instruct the CBFC to reassess the film’s certification, include a clear disclaimer to specify the fictional nature of its content, and consider removing objectionable scenes or reclassifying it with an ‘Adults Only’ rating.
However, the court chose not to address the issue for immediate hearing, allowing the film’s release on October 31 to proceed unless further judicial action is taken.