What Did the Delhi HC Say About Missing Practical Marks at DU's Bhagini Nivedita College?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Delhi High Court has intervened in a significant case concerning a student's missing practical marks at Bhagini Nivedita College. This situation raises questions about administrative accountability and students' rights within the academic framework. Read on for more insights into this developing story!
Key Takeaways
- Delhi High Court intervenes in a student’s plea.
- Marks for an external practical exam were allegedly not uploaded.
- Claims of negligence and mismanagement by college authorities.
- Petitioner argues her rights have been violated.
- Potential impacts on her future academic opportunities.
New Delhi, Aug 5 (NationPress) On Tuesday, the Delhi High Court issued a notice regarding a petition from a student at Bhagini Nivedita College, part of Delhi University. The student claimed that the marks for the external practical examination were not submitted to the university portal due to negligence and mismanagement by the course instructor and the college's administration.
The petitioner, a final-year B.A. Programme student, highlighted that all her classmates received the same failing grade in the practical component of the Children with Disability in India course during their sixth semester, suggesting a broader issue at play.
A single-judge Bench led by Justice Vikas Mahajan agreed to review the case and directed that notices be sent to officials at Delhi University, Bhagini Nivedita College, and Dr. Charru Sharma, the instructor involved.
The petition asserted that Rawat had completed all aspects of the subject—namely theory, internal assessments, and the external practical exam—but due to negligence and mismanagement on the part of the instructor and the administrative body, her practical examination marks were not recorded in the university system.
Despite submitting numerous complaints to both the college and university officials, Rawat received no written response or corrective action, leading to claims of mutual blame between the college and the instructor.
She contended that the inaction of these authorities breached her fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, prompting her to file a writ petition at the Delhi High Court through advocate Ashu Bidhuri.
The petition demanded that Delhi University and Bhagini Nivedita College promptly amend her results by including her actual external practical marks and issuing a corrected mark sheet that reflects her passing status in the subject.
“The incorrect result has had a direct impact on the petitioner’s overall CGPA and academic standing, potentially hindering her eligibility for higher education, competitive examinations such as UGC-NET, and future academic endeavors, including Ph.D. applications, where academic performance is vital,” stated the plea.
Point of View
This incident highlights critical issues of administrative transparency and accountability within educational institutions. It underscores the need for universities to uphold their responsibilities towards students, ensuring that their academic records are managed accurately and fairly. NationPress believes in advocating for student rights and the need for systemic improvements in our education system.
NationPress
07/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the main issue in the Delhi High Court case?
The main issue was that a student claimed her external practical examination marks were never uploaded due to negligence and mismanagement by the teacher and college administration.
How did the Delhi High Court respond?
The Delhi High Court issued a notice on the student's plea and sought responses from relevant parties including Delhi University and the college.
What are the potential consequences for the student?
The incorrect results could adversely affect her CGPA and eligibility for higher education and competitive exams.
