Did Kerala HC Find Fault with Devaswom Board Over Global Ayyappa Meet?

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Did Kerala HC Find Fault with Devaswom Board Over Global Ayyappa Meet?

Synopsis

The Travancore Devaswom Board has rebuffed claims of financial misconduct regarding the Global Ayyappa Meet, despite the Kerala High Court's criticisms. The Board insists allegations are unfounded, while the controversy continues to spark discussions about transparency in large-scale religious events.

Key Takeaways

Allegations of financial misconduct have been strongly denied by the Travancore Devaswom Board.
The Kerala High Court has raised concerns about financial accountability in organizing the Global Ayyappa Meet.
Routine renovations at the Pamba guest house were part of the budget allocation.
The Board clarified discrepancies in the audit report due to document errors.
Debate on transparency in religious event management has intensified amidst ongoing scrutiny.

Thiruvananthapuram, Feb 14 (NationPress) The Travancore Devaswom Board has firmly dismissed allegations regarding financial misconduct linked to the Global Ayyappa Meet, which took place at Pamba in September of the previous year. This comes after the Kerala High Court recently criticized the Board for financial accountability issues associated with the event.

The Board described the recent media reports as "groundless and deceptive", particularly addressing allegations that public funds were utilized to buy a bed for Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.

It was clarified that neither the audit report nor the Special Commissioner's submission to the High Court included any mention of such expenses.

The Rs 3.83 lakh allocated for 'Furniture and Miscellaneous Items for Existing Office Complex and Guest House' was part of routine renovations at the Pamba guest house, which hosts visiting dignitaries, including Union Ministers and judges, as stated by the Board.

The High Court expressed serious concern regarding procedural and accounting irregularities in organizing the meet, ordering an examination of the accounts to be presented to the Special Commissioner.

The Board admitted that some discrepancies were found in the Chartered Accountant's report, attributing this to the necessity of meeting the court's deadline prior to a more thorough verification process.

Regarding the payments for a 'bhajan' performance, the Board clarified that Rs 8 lakh was disbursed to a music group led by Ishan Dev, which included more than 35 artists and technicians.

It denied any payment to 'Nandagovindam Bhajans', explaining that a reference in the audit report stemmed from a documentation error by the event management agency.

The Board outlined the financial structure of the event, noting that Rs 5 crore from the 2025–26 budget was temporarily set aside in a special account to ensure the smooth conduct of the event while awaiting sponsorship funds.

Out of this amount, Rs 3 crore was given as an advance to the Indian Institute of Infrastructure and Construction (IIIC), the designated event management agency.

Sponsorship funds totaling Rs 3 crore from Dhanalakshmi Bank and Kerala Bank have since been returned to the Board’s general fund.

Addressing claims of inflated food bills, the Board asserted that meals were provided to devotees, workers, and guests equitably, often surpassing initial estimates.

The ongoing judicial scrutiny has heightened the debate over the transparency of managing large-scale religious events associated with the internationally recognized Sabarimala pilgrimage.

In an effort to defend the Pinarayi Vijayan administration, CPI(M) state secretary M. V. Govindan stated that the figures being circulated are simply estimates, not actual amounts. Nonetheless, questions are arising regarding the audit report.

The matter has escalated into a significant misstep by the Board and the Devasom Ministry, led by State Minister V.N. Vasavan, who has consistently shifted responsibility to the Board, reiterating that it is an autonomous body.

Veteran Congress leader K. Muraleedharan remarked that the situation has reached a point where only Lord Ayyappa's idol remains at Sabarimala.

He questioned, "If the state government claims the Board conducted the meet, why did the State Protocol officer arrange accommodations in distant locations like Munnar and Kumarakom for invited guests, while the event was held at Pamba? Vasavan must resign due to this misappropriation," Muraleedharan asserted.

Point of View

It is vital to approach the ongoing situation surrounding the Travancore Devaswom Board with an unbiased lens. The allegations and subsequent responses highlight the pressing need for transparency and accountability in the management of significant religious events, a sentiment echoed by various stakeholders in our society.
NationPress
7 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the allegations against the Travancore Devaswom Board?
The allegations involve claims of financial irregularities linked to the Global Ayyappa Meet, including improper use of public funds.
What did the Kerala High Court say about the event?
The Kerala High Court criticized the Board for lapses in financial accountability and ordered a thorough examination of the accounts related to the meet.
How did the Travancore Devaswom Board respond to the allegations?
The Board dismissed the allegations as baseless and misleading, clarifying that the audit report did not mention the contested expenditures.
What was the budget allocated for the event?
The Board temporarily allocated Rs 5 crore from the 2025–26 budget for the event to ensure smooth operations while awaiting sponsorship.
What are the implications of this controversy?
The controversy has intensified discussions about the need for transparency in managing large-scale religious gatherings, especially those connected to the Sabarimala pilgrimage.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 2 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google