ED files PMLA charge sheet against Sai Group in ₹43.73 crore Mumbai fraud

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
ED files PMLA charge sheet against Sai Group in ₹43.73 crore Mumbai fraud

Synopsis

The ED has charged three Sai Group promoters and seven linked entities with laundering ₹43.73 crore collected from homebuyers across four Mumbai localities — and has attached assets stretching from Ahmednagar to the United Kingdom. The overseas holdings are the sharpest detail in a case that exposes how redevelopment fraud can move money across borders.

Key Takeaways

The ED, Mumbai Zonal Office filed a PMLA charge sheet before the Special Court (PMLA), Mumbai against Jayesh Vinod Tanna , Deep Vinod Tanna , Vivek Jayesh Tanna , and seven Sai Group entities .
Alleged fund diversion totalled ₹43.73 crore , affecting redevelopment projects in DN Nagar , Andheri , Kandivali , and Goregaon .
The ED attached assets worth ₹43.73 crore under Section 5 of the PMLA , including properties in Mumbai , Ahmednagar , and the United Kingdom .
The case originated from multiple Mumbai Police FIRs registered in 2024 under the IPC and Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA), 1963 .
The matter will now proceed to trial before the Special Court, where evidence will be examined to determine culpability.

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Mumbai Zonal Office, has filed a charge sheet under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, before the Special Court (PMLA), Mumbai, against three promoters — Jayesh Vinod Tanna, Deep Vinod Tanna, and Vivek Jayesh Tanna — along with seven entities of the Sai Group, in connection with alleged fund diversion worth ₹43.73 crore from housing redevelopment projects across the Mumbai Metropolitan Region.

Background and Origins of the Case

The probe traces its origins to 2024, when Mumbai Police registered multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA), 1963. The ED subsequently launched a parallel money laundering investigation, examining financial flows linked to several redevelopment projects.

According to the agency, the Sai Group's promoters allegedly collected funds from flat and shop buyers under the pretext of financing construction, but diverted the money away from the projects entirely — leaving buyers without promised housing units and investors without recourse.

Scale of Alleged Diversion and Affected Areas

The ED's investigation found that the alleged diversion of funds totalled ₹43.73 crore, affecting redevelopment projects in DN Nagar, Andheri, Kandivali, and Goregaon — all densely populated localities within Mumbai. The promoters are accused of misleading buyers, failing to deliver promised housing units, and breaching financial trust, according to the agency's findings.

Notably, this pattern — collecting buyer advances and diverting them before construction begins — has become one of the most common vectors of real estate fraud in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, according to enforcement officials.

Assets Attached Under PMLA

To secure the alleged proceeds of crime, the ED invoked Section 5 of the PMLA and attached assets valued at ₹43.73 crore. The attached holdings include properties in Mumbai and Ahmednagar, as well as overseas assets in the United Kingdom — a detail that signals the alleged diversion extended beyond domestic borders.

What Happens Next

With the charge sheet now formally placed before the Special Court, the case will proceed to trial. The court will examine the evidence presented by the ED to determine the culpability of the three accused individuals and the seven Sai Group entities. The ED noted that such fraudulent practices not only damage the housing sector but also erode public trust in redevelopment schemes more broadly.

The filing reinforces a pattern of intensified enforcement action against real estate-linked money laundering cases, which authorities say have proliferated due to weak oversight of redevelopment fund flows. How the trial unfolds will be closely watched by homebuyer advocacy groups and the broader real estate industry in Maharashtra.

Point of View

And the regulatory gap between RERA registration and actual fund utilisation remains wide. The ED's intensified focus on redevelopment fraud is welcome, but enforcement action after the fact does little for buyers already locked out of their homes. The real question is whether Maharashtra's housing regulators will tighten advance-collection norms before the next such case reaches a PMLA court.
NationPress
13 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ED's case against the Sai Group?
The ED has filed a PMLA charge sheet alleging that Sai Group promoters diverted ₹43.73 crore collected from flat and shop buyers in redevelopment projects across Mumbai instead of using the funds for construction. Three individuals — Jayesh Vinod Tanna, Deep Vinod Tanna, and Vivek Jayesh Tanna — and seven Sai Group entities have been charged.
Which areas in Mumbai were affected by the alleged fraud?
The alleged fund diversion impacted redevelopment projects in DN Nagar, Andheri, Kandivali, and Goregaon — all localities within the Mumbai Metropolitan Region. Buyers in these projects were left without promised housing units.
What assets has the ED attached in this case?
The ED has attached assets worth ₹43.73 crore under Section 5 of the PMLA. These include properties in Mumbai and Ahmednagar, as well as overseas holdings in the United Kingdom.
How did the ED's investigation begin?
The case originated in 2024 when Mumbai Police registered multiple FIRs under the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA), 1963. The ED then launched a parallel money laundering probe under the PMLA.
What happens now that the charge sheet has been filed?
The matter will proceed to trial before the Special Court (PMLA) in Mumbai. The court will examine the ED's evidence to determine the culpability of the three accused individuals and the seven Sai Group entities named in the charge sheet.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 4 months ago
  3. 5 months ago
  4. 6 months ago
  5. 8 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google