Was South Korea's Ex-PM Han Justly Sentenced to 23 Years for His Role in the Insurrection?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a groundbreaking ruling, former South Korean Prime Minister Han Duck-soo has been sentenced to 23 years in prison for his pivotal role in an insurrection linked to martial law. This case raises pressing questions about political accountability and governance in South Korea.
Key Takeaways
- Han Duck-soo sentenced to 23 years for insurrection.
- Involvement in martial law declaration seen as a serious offense.
- Judge emphasized the duty of public officials to uphold the Constitution.
- Case may influence future political accountability in South Korea.
- Yoon's trial may be impacted by this ruling.
Seoul, Jan 21 (NationPress) Han Duck-soo, the former Prime Minister of South Korea, received a 23-year prison sentence on Wednesday for his significant involvement in an insurrection, which included supporting former President Yoon Suk Yeol during a brief period of martial law.
The Seoul Central District Court delivered this verdict, marking the first ruling that validated the declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024, as an act of insurrection, as reported by Yonhap News Agency.
The sentence was more severe than the 15 years requested by special counsel Cho Eun-suk, addressing charges that involved aiding the leader of the insurrection, playing a pivotal role in the uprising, and committing perjury.
Presiding Judge Lee Jin-gwan mandated Han's detention, citing the risk of evidence tampering.
The court revealed that Han participated in the insurrection by suggesting Yoon convene a Cabinet meeting prior to declaring the martial law.
During the Cabinet meeting, Han did not express any dissent regarding the declaration and seemingly motivated then Interior Minister Lee Sang-min to execute Yoon's orders to cut off utilities to media outlets critical of the government.
“As a prime minister, the defendant held a responsibility to uphold the Constitution and laws and strive to protect democratic values,” Judge Lee articulated during the live-streamed sentencing hearing.
“Yet, he failed to fulfill this obligation, believing the insurrection on December 3 might be successful and chose to participate,” he continued.
Han is the first individual from Yoon's Cabinet to face sentencing concerning the martial law decree, which was retracted after just six hours following a National Assembly vote.
The court also found him guilty of signing an amended proclamation post-repeal of the decree, aiming to lend it legitimacy while also lying under oath at the Constitutional Court.
Han has denied all allegations, asserting he had no prior knowledge of the martial law plans aside from the announcement and never supported or aided it.
This ruling is expected to impact Yoon's own trial regarding his role in the martial law declaration, which concluded last week with the special counsel team seeking the death penalty, and a verdict is anticipated on February 19.
According to the Constitution, an insurrection is defined as an act intended to remove state power from part or all of the nation or staging a riot aimed at undermining the Constitution.
Point of View
I view this ruling as a significant moment in South Korea's democratic journey. It highlights the importance of accountability among public officials. The ramifications of this case could reshape the political fabric of our nation, ensuring that those in power are held responsible for their actions.
NationPress
23/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Han Duck-soo sentenced to 23 years?
Han Duck-soo was sentenced for his role in an insurrection by supporting the former President's martial law decree.
What were the charges against Han Duck-soo?
He faced charges including abetting an insurrection leader, playing a pivotal role in the insurrection, and committing perjury.
What is the significance of the court's ruling?
The ruling is crucial as it confirms that the declaration of martial law constituted an insurrection and sets a legal precedent for accountability in governance.
What could be the implications for former President Yoon Suk Yeol?
The ruling may affect the ongoing trial of former President Yoon, who is also facing charges related to the martial law decree.
What defines an insurrection under South Korean law?
An insurrection is defined as an act aimed at removing state authority or staging a riot to undermine the Constitution.
