Humayun Kabir Declines to Engage with Tribunal on Voter List Controversy
Synopsis
In a bold stance against the Supreme Court's directive, Humayun Kabir, chairman of the Aam Janata Unnayan Party, refuses to approach the tribunal regarding the exclusion of names from the voter list. His comments during a protest highlight concerns over voter rights and political accountability.
Key Takeaways
Supreme Court's tribunal will hear voter list omissions.
Humayun Kabir refuses to engage with the tribunal.
Protests organized against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR).
Concerns raised about voter rights during potential delays.
Political accountability questioned amidst ongoing tensions.
Kolkata, March 11 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has mandated the establishment of a tribunal to address appeals from individuals whose names have been excluded from the voter list during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) initiative. However, the chairman of the Aam Janata Unnayan Party, Humayun Kabir, declared on Wednesday that he will not seek the tribunal's intervention.
“I will never approach the tribunal,” asserted Kabir.
On the same day, the Aam Janata Unnayan Party held a protest gathering and a deputation program against the SIR at Textile More in Berhampore, located in the Murshidabad district. Kabir participated in the protest and voiced his opinions regarding the tribunal.
The Bharatpur MLA elaborated on his reluctance to engage with the tribunal, stating, “Going to the tribunal could mean a delay of three to four years in resolving this matter. During that time, voters will lose their voting rights.”
He further expressed determination to escalate protests if necessary, saying, “If needed, I will conduct block-by-block dharnas with voters whose names are being reviewed in the final voter list.”
Having been previously suspended from the Trinamool Congress, Kabir attributed the current state of affairs to West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.
During the protest, a lorry served as an improvised stage from which Kabir addressed his party supporters. Numerous party leaders were in attendance, asserting that the names of approximately 11 lakh voters in Murshidabad district are currently under review.
Subsequently, an eight-member delegation presented a memorandum to the district administration. Although the District Magistrate was unavailable, the Additional District Magistrate accepted the memorandum on his behalf.
The day prior to the protest, on Tuesday, the Shaktipur police station issued a notice to Kabir and his wife, requesting their appearance before the police, reportedly regarding claims about a house constructed on a drainage channel without altering the land-use status in official records.
In response to the notice, Kabir remarked, “I am unfazed by this. They will do whatever they wish. After twenty-two years, they have finally taken notice. I am aware of who is responsible, and so is everyone else. I will signal the end for the Chief Minister.”
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of the tribunal formed by the Supreme Court?
The tribunal is designed to hear appeals from individuals whose names were omitted from the voter list during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process.
Why is Humayun Kabir against approaching the tribunal?
Kabir believes that engaging with the tribunal could lead to a lengthy resolution process of three to four years, during which voters would lose their voting rights.
What actions did the Aam Janata Unnayan Party take against the SIR?
The party organized a protest meeting and a deputation program to express their opposition to the SIR at Textile More in Berhampore.
How did Kabir respond to the police notice?
He stated that he is unfazed by the notice and accused the authorities of only now taking action after twenty-two years.
What are the implications of this situation for voters in Murshidabad?
Approximately 11 lakh voters in Murshidabad district are currently under adjudication, which raises concerns over their voting rights and representation.
