CMRL-Exalogic case: Kerala BJP chief demands FIR, ED has shared evidence

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
CMRL-Exalogic case: Kerala BJP chief demands FIR, ED has shared evidence

Synopsis

Kerala BJP chief Rajeev Chandrasekhar has publicly demanded to know why the state government hasn't registered an FIR in the CMRL-Exalogic case — even after the ED reportedly handed over evidence. His pointed question about CM Satheesan's name appearing in the CMRL diary marks a sharp escalation, directly implicating the sitting government rather than just its predecessor.

Key Takeaways

Kerala BJP President Rajeev Chandrasekhar demanded an FIR in the CMRL-Exalogic case on 24 September 2026 .
The Enforcement Directorate has reportedly shared information and evidence with the Kerala state government, yet no FIR has been filed.
Allegations claim CMRL paid Exalogic — linked to T.
Veena , daughter of former CM Pinarayi Vijayan — without receiving services in return.
Chandrasekhar demanded CM V.D.
Satheesan clarify whether his name in the CMRL diary is connected to any payments.
The BJP also attacked the UDF government's first 150 days , citing alleged corruption, Range Rover and private jet controversies.

Kerala Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President and MLA Rajeev Chandrasekhar on Thursday, 24 September publicly challenged Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan to explain why no First Information Report (FIR) has been registered in the CMRL-Exalogic financial transaction case, even after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) had reportedly handed over information and evidence to the state government. The demand escalates political pressure on the United Democratic Front (UDF) government in Thiruvananthapuram, which completed 150 days in office around this period.

The Core Allegation

At the heart of the controversy are claims that CMRL — a company associated with Kerala's public infrastructure ecosystem — made payments to Exalogic without receiving any commensurate services in return. Chandrasekhar alleged that Exalogic is linked to T. Veena, the daughter of former Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. 'The allegations involved the company linked to T. Veena, the daughter of former Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan,' he said.

Chandrasekhar described the matter as 'a serious allegation of political corruption' that must be properly investigated. He questioned why the state government had neither registered an FIR nor ordered a Vigilance probe despite the ED's reported findings. 'If there is no substance in the allegations, an investigation should establish that. Why then is the state government not registering an FIR?' he asked.

CM Satheesan's Name in CMRL Diary

Chandrasekhar further escalated the confrontation by referring to reports that Chief Minister Satheesan's name had surfaced in a CMRL diary — an internal document that has reportedly become central to the broader investigation. He demanded that Satheesan personally clarify whether he had received any money referenced in the diary. 'The Chief Minister himself must answer this question. If the allegations are baseless, let an investigation establish the facts,' Chandrasekhar said.

This is the first time a senior BJP leader has publicly linked Satheesan's name to the diary entries, adding a direct political dimension to what had previously been framed as a case concerning the previous Left Democratic Front (LDF) government.

BJP's Broader Attack on 150-Day UDF Government

Beyond the CMRL-Exalogic matter, Chandrasekhar used the press interaction to mount a wider critique of the UDF government's first 150 days in office. He alleged that the present dispensation was continuing the political and administrative practices associated with the preceding LDF regime, including what he described as corruption, double standards, and broken promises.

Chandrasekhar also raised the controversy surrounding the use of a Range Rover and a private jet, calling them emblematic of governmental excess. He questioned whether such displays were all the administration had to offer after five months in office.

Referring to the outgoing LDF tenure, Chandrasekhar asked: 'What did Pinarayi Vijayan give Kerala after promising to set everything right in 10 years? Did the people not face corruption allegations, lack of development, unemployment and price rise?'

What Happens Next

Chandrasekhar concluded by stating that corruption allegations demanded a lawful investigation rather than a political settlement, implying that the government was attempting to manage the matter outside formal legal channels. The BJP is expected to intensify pressure through the legislature and public campaigns if no formal inquiry is ordered. The state government has not yet responded officially to the BJP's demands as of the time of this report.

Point of View

Chandrasekhar is attempting to deny the Satheesan administration the political capital it might otherwise earn from distancing itself from Vijayan's legacy. The ED angle is significant — if evidence has genuinely been handed over and no FIR follows, that is an accountability gap the opposition is entitled to probe. The CMRL diary reference is the sharpest escalation yet and puts the Chief Minister on the defensive in a way routine political attacks do not. Whether the allegations have legal substance remains to be tested; but the political damage from not ordering an inquiry may already be accumulating.
NationPress
24 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CMRL-Exalogic case in Kerala?
The CMRL-Exalogic case involves allegations that CMRL, a Kerala public-sector-linked company, paid Exalogic — reportedly connected to T. Veena, daughter of former Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan — without receiving any services in return. The Enforcement Directorate has reportedly handed over evidence to the state government, but no FIR has been registered so far.
Why is Kerala BJP demanding an FIR in the CMRL-Exalogic case?
BJP President Rajeev Chandrasekhar argues that the ED has already shared information and evidence with the state government, making non-registration of an FIR difficult to justify. He contends that a lawful investigation — not a political settlement — is required to determine whether the allegations have substance.
What is the significance of CM Satheesan's name appearing in the CMRL diary?
Chandrasekhar referred to reports that Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan's name appeared in the CMRL diary, and demanded he clarify whether he received any money referenced there. This is the first time a senior BJP leader has publicly linked Satheesan directly to the diary entries, escalating the case beyond its original focus on the previous LDF government.
Who is T. Veena and why is she mentioned in the CMRL-Exalogic controversy?
T. Veena is the daughter of former Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. The BJP alleges that Exalogic, the company that allegedly received payments from CMRL without rendering services, is linked to her — giving the controversy its political dimension.
What other allegations did Rajeev Chandrasekhar raise against the UDF government?
Beyond the CMRL-Exalogic matter, Chandrasekhar alleged that the UDF government was replicating the corruption and administrative failures of the previous LDF government. He cited controversies over the use of a Range Rover and a private jet, and questioned the government's performance after 150 days in office.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 9 hours ago
  2. Yesterday
  3. 5 days ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 4 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google