Will the Kerala HC's Decision Impact Vijayan Government's Employee Regularisation Plans?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kochi, Feb 20 (NationPress) In a notable blow to the state administration, the Kerala High Court has temporarily halted the initiative to regularise employees who have been serving for over a decade on a daily wage and contract basis across government-controlled Public Sector Undertakings, autonomous entities, and the Kerala Kalamandalam. With the Assembly elections approaching, this development has taken the Vijayan government by surprise.
After suffering significant losses in the local body elections held last December, the reputation of the state government has taken a hit, prompting CM Vijayan to strive for stability.
On February 17, the High Court issued another setback by suspending an ongoing survey intended to assess public sentiment.
The court ruled that no temporary appointments would be regularised beyond September 2025.
This decision came while addressing a petition that claimed the government’s new effort to provide permanent status to temporary employees breached a prior court order.
In 2021, just before the first Pinarayi Vijayan government left office, the mass regularisation of temporary staff had faced legal challenges.
The court had previously decided that only those appointed against sanctioned positions could be regularised, and no further regularisations should proceed.
The current petition argued that the latest move is tantamount to contempt of court.
Two weeks ago, the court mandated the Chief Secretary to submit an affidavit regarding this issue.
The regularisation plan encompassed positions in gram panchayats, municipalities, cultural institutions, panchayat libraries, bal mandirs, and nursery schools.
Individuals working on an honorarium or daily wage basis—including librarians, nursery teachers, and ayahs with at least ten years of continuous service—were to be integrated as part-time contingent employees.
The Cabinet had also approved the permanent status for those initially appointed as part-time via the Employment Exchange and later transitioned to daily wage roles.
This proposal has stirred political debate, with accusations that numerous beneficiaries are related to or are supporters of the ruling party.