Madras HC Orders Additional Rs 25 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Madras High Court has ordered the Tamil Nadu government to pay an additional Rs 25 lakh to the family of Ajith Kumar, a temple guard allegedly tortured to death while in custody. This incident has sparked significant public outrage and raised pressing questions about custodial violence in the region.
Key Takeaways
- Madras High Court mandates additional compensation.
- Public outrage over custodial violence.
- Investigation led by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
- Suspension of police personnel involved in the case.
- Calls for reforms in the justice system.
Chennai, July 22 (NationPress) The Madras High Court has mandated the Tamil Nadu government to provide an additional Rs 25 lakh as interim compensation to the family of Ajith Kumar, a 28-year-old temple guard who purportedly died as a result of custodial torture in Sivaganga district. This payment is supplementary to the Rs 7.5 lakh previously granted by the state.
The court issued this order during the proceedings of a series of petitions that called for an unbiased investigation and accountability in the case of the custodial death, which has sparked widespread public indignation throughout Tamil Nadu.
Moreover, the court directed the authorities to review applications from crucial witnesses in the case seeking protection under the Witness Protection Scheme, amidst fears of intimidation often linked with custodial violence cases.
Ajith Kumar, employed as a security guard at the Madapuram Kaliamman Temple, was detained by the Sivaganga police for questioning related to a theft complaint lodged by two women—Sivakami and her daughter Nikitha—who alleged that their vehicle was robbed of 10 sovereigns of gold jewelry.
Shortly after his detention, Ajith was discovered dead. His family contended that he had been subjected to severe torture during police questioning, resulting in his death. They dismissed the police's initial assertion that he died of natural causes, prompting protests, media scrutiny, and political backlash.
Under escalating public pressure, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) assumed control of the case and filed an FIR on July 12 against unnamed officers from the Sivaganga crime branch.
During its investigation, the CBI allegedly uncovered that the vehicle used by the police to apprehend Ajith was operating under a fake registration number—a finding that has intensified suspicions of misconduct.
Six police personnel involved in the questioning have been suspended, and a departmental inquiry is ongoing.
The court’s emphatic remarks and orders have amplified calls for justice and accountability in a case that has once again underscored the grave issue of custodial violence within the state.
Point of View
It is imperative to acknowledge the pressing issue of custodial violence that this case brings to light. The Madras High Court's intervention reflects a critical demand for accountability, underscoring the need for systemic reforms to protect individuals in custody. The public's outrage is justified, and it is essential for authorities to address these concerns with urgency and transparency.
NationPress
22/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What led to the custodial death of Ajith Kumar?
Ajith Kumar was detained by the police for questioning regarding a theft complaint before he was found dead, with allegations of torture during interrogation.
What compensation has the Madras High Court ordered?
The court has mandated an additional Rs 25 lakh as interim compensation, on top of the Rs 7.5 lakh already provided.
What steps are being taken regarding the police involved?
Six policemen involved in Ajith's interrogation have been suspended, and a departmental inquiry is currently in progress.
How has the public reacted to this case?
The custodial death has provoked widespread protests and significant media attention, highlighting public outrage against custodial violence.
Is there an investigation into the case?
Yes, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has taken over the investigation and registered an FIR against unidentified officers.
