Why Did Kerala LoP Satheesan Urge Meta Not to Block the Viral Sabarimala Gold Theft Parody Song?

Click to start listening
Why Did Kerala LoP Satheesan Urge Meta Not to Block the Viral Sabarimala Gold Theft Parody Song?

Synopsis

In a bold move, Kerala's Opposition leader V.D. Satheesan challenges Meta's authority to censor a viral parody song regarding the Sabarimala gold theft. His plea underscores the importance of free speech and the need for legal backing before any content removal, setting a critical precedent for online expression.

Key Takeaways

  • Satirical expression is protected under the Constitution.
  • Content removal should follow legal protocols.
  • Freedom of speech is a fundamental right.
  • Administrative requests without court orders can lead to censorship.
  • Judicial standards must guide content moderation.

Thiruvananthapuram, Dec 19 (NationPress) V.D. Satheesan, the Leader of the Opposition in the Kerala Assembly, has officially reached out to Meta Platforms Inc., requesting the social media giant to refrain from removing links to a satirical song associated with the alleged gold theft parody at the Sabarimala temple. He cautioned that any removal executed without a court order would constitute an unconstitutional limitation on free speech.

In his correspondence, Satheesan referenced reports indicating that the Kerala Police had requested various social media platforms, including those managed by Meta, to eliminate links to the song titled “Pottiye Kettiye”. This song has gained traction online in connection with the disputed disappearance of gold from the Sabarimala temple.

Additionally, the Opposition leader pointed out that the Thiruvananthapuram Cyber Police have initiated a case regarding the song's creation and dissemination.

Nevertheless, he stressed that, at present, there exists no judicial ruling, court mandate, or statutory directive that compels the removal of this content.

Referencing consistent decisions from the Supreme Court, Satheesan asserted that the right to freedom of speech and expression cannot be restricted unless a tangible and legally established breach of law is proven.

In a democracy governed by law, he contended, any limitations on speech must strictly comply with due process.

Satheesan underscored that parody and satire are recognized forms of artistic expression protected under the Constitution, only subject to reasonable constraints imposed through lawful and judicially sanctioned means.

He warned that administrative or police requests, absent a competent court order, should not serve as grounds for content removal.

Such actions, he cautioned, could lead to prior restraint, establish a detrimental precedent for censorship, and inflict irreparable damage on content creators.

Permitting law enforcement agencies to achieve takedowns without judicial oversight would undermine constitutional protections and suppress legitimate expression, as highlighted in his letter.

In this context, Satheesan urged Meta to avoid removing or disabling access to links related to the song unless a competent court of law issues a clear and specific directive.

Alternatively, he suggested that Meta could only act if, following an independent evaluation, the content is determined to be in clear violation of its own Community Standards.

This letter emerges amidst escalating political controversy regarding the alleged Sabarimala gold theft and growing concerns over the misuse of police authority to suppress online critique and satire in Kerala.

Point of View

We understand the delicate balance between free expression and regulatory oversight. V.D. Satheesan's appeal to Meta highlights critical issues of censorship and the necessity of legal frameworks governing content removal. The ongoing discourse surrounding the Sabarimala gold theft incident illustrates the complexities of free speech in today's digital landscape.
NationPress
20/12/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main concern raised by V.D. Satheesan?
V.D. Satheesan's primary concern is the potential removal of a viral parody song without a court order, which he argues would infringe on free speech rights.
What is the title of the satirical song in question?
The satirical song is titled 'Pottiye Kettiye'.
What legal backing does Satheesan cite for his argument?
He references consistent rulings from the Supreme Court regarding the protection of freedom of speech and expression.
What potential consequences does Satheesan warn against?
He warns that allowing takedowns without judicial oversight could set a dangerous precedent for censorship and harm content creators.
What steps does Satheesan recommend for Meta?
He urges Meta to refrain from content removal unless directed by a competent court or if the content violates their Community Standards.
Nation Press