Is Sajad Lone Correct in Criticizing J&K's Free Electricity Promise?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Sajad Lone, President of the Peoples Conference, raises serious concerns about the Jammu and Kashmir government's promise of free electricity. He claims the commitment is not only misleading but also highlights the technical and financial flaws in its execution.
Key Takeaways
- Sajad Lone questions the National Conference's electricity promise.
- The 200 units of free electricity are limited to AAY families.
- Implementation of the promise relies on the PM Surya Ghar Solar Rooftop Scheme.
- Estimated cost for solar installations could reach Rs 1,500 crore.
- Questions remain about budget allocation and project timelines.
Srinagar, June 28 (NationPress) The President of the Peoples Conference (PC) and MLA of Handwara, Sajad Lone, expressed his criticism on Saturday regarding the National Conference’s electoral commitment of delivering 200 units of free electricity. He labeled this promise as deceptive, filled with technical and financial discrepancies, and accused the government of lacking the determination to realize it.
He pointed out that what was initially presented as a universal benefit has been limited to a scheme meant solely for AAY families, which is executed through a central government initiative, rather than being a novel proposal from the National Conference (NC).
“In the NC election manifesto, the promise of free electricity up to 200 units was made. However, it was clarified in the Assembly that this applies exclusively to AAY families,” Lone stated, emphasizing that the promise is entirely dependent on the PM Surya Ghar Solar Rooftop Scheme, a centrally sponsored initiative already accessible to all states and Union Territories in India.
Lone observed that nearly ten months have passed since the commitment was made, yet free electricity remains out of reach.
“I will attempt to outline a step-by-step approach to determine whether the delay is due to the government, a specific department, a lack of funds, or insufficient will, or if they simply lack the authority to proceed,” he declared.
Detailing the scheme's structure, Lone explained that the central government covers 70% of the installation expenses, while the remaining 30%, the beneficiary portion, must be funded by the state government.
He elaborated on the technical and financial ramifications, indicating that to supply 200 units of electricity, a minimum of 300 units of solar energy would be essential, especially during nighttime when sunlight is not available.
This necessitates the installation of 2 KW capacity rooftop solar panels.
“A properly tendered 2 KW system can generate 300 units,” Lone asserted, drawing attention to past inefficiencies.
“The historical performance of NC in solar installations has been poor. Very poor. Many installations from their tenure are non-functional.”
He estimated the cost of a 2 KW solar installation to be Rs 1.3 lakh, recalling figures from his time as a minister.
With the union government’s contribution capped at Rs 66,000, the state would need to provide Rs 74,000 for each installation.
This would amount to a staggering Rs 1,500 crore for the estimated 200,000 AAY households.
“The initial question is whether the government has allocated this amount in the budget. Is there a budgetary provision?”
Lone also presented what he termed a step-by-step 'idiot’s guide' for implementing the scheme, starting with feasibility studies, cost evaluations, and resource mobilization.
“This must be followed by budget allocation for the project and the identification of 200,000 rooftops across all villages in Jammu and Kashmir,” he explained.
The subsequent step would involve installing meters at these identified sites, likely a prerequisite for solar units to become operational. Only then could the government proceed to tender the project, establish timelines, move forward with installation, and ensure payments by drawing the Centre’s share and covering the state’s share from previously allocated budgetary funds.
Raising a number of unresolved queries, Lone questioned, “At what stage do we stand? What is the timeline? Have resources for this initiative been allocated in the budget passed in March? Will the government compensate the AAY families under the Direct Beneficiary Transfer scheme until the solar rooftop is installed—if and when it is installed?”
He assessed the financial implications during the transition phase, asserting that at the rate of Rs 4.5 per unit, the cost would amount to Rs 900 per family monthly, amounting to Rs 2 crore each month.
“To date, this totals to Rs 18 crore and counting,” he noted.
“The government must address these questions,” Lone insisted.
“Is there any obstacle? I can’t identify any obstacle besides the government’s lack of determination.”
He cautioned, “I fear the AAY families are in for significant challenges. I’m uncertain if they will receive free power. One thing they can expect for sure is the electrical meter.”
Point of View
I emphasize that while political promises can often be filled with ambition, the reality checks presented by leaders like Sajad Lone serve as reminders of the necessity for transparency and accountability in governance. It is crucial for citizens to remain informed and engaged as they navigate these complex issues.
NationPress
28/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Sajad Lone criticize?
Sajad Lone criticized the National Conference's promise of providing 200 units of free electricity, labeling it as misleading and technically flawed.
What is the basis of the 200 units free electricity promise?
The promise is largely dependent on the PM Surya Ghar Solar Rooftop Scheme and is targeted only towards AAY families.
How much would the state need to contribute for solar installations?
The state would need to contribute Rs 74,000 for each 2 KW solar installation, totaling approximately Rs 1,500 crore for 200,000 households.
What questions did Lone raise about the implementation?
Lone questioned if the government allocated budget for the project, the timeline for implementation, and how AAY families would be compensated in the interim.
What financial implications did Lone highlight?
Lone pointed out that at Rs 4.5 per unit, the cost for AAY families during the transition could be Rs 900 monthly, accumulating to significant financial burdens.
