Why is Shiv Sena-UBT Opposing the Municipal Elections Announcement?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Mumbai, Dec 15 (NationPress) In a formal letter to the Maharashtra State Election Commission (SEC), the Shiv Sena-UBT has expressed its dissent regarding the announcement of elections for 29 municipal corporations, including the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), labeling it as hasty.
The party contends that the election timetable was revealed before the final voter list was completed.
Moreover, Shiv Sena-UBT has raised concerns over the inadequate management and lack of transparency from the SEC.
They stated, "The State Election Commission had assured the release of the final electoral list for the municipal elections. The BMC also issued advertisements claiming the same, yet the completed voter list is not available on the SEC's website nor can it be found in printed form at the BMC headquarters. While the voter list process remains incomplete, the SEC hastily called a press conference to announce the elections. This represents not only administrative negligence but also infringes upon voters' rights and undermines the democratic process."
In their letter, they questioned, "What is the urgency behind declaring the elections when the necessary administrative arrangements are still pending? Announcing elections under such substandard and flawed conditions is both legally and morally questionable. This scenario casts doubt on the integrity of the electoral process."
Shiv Sena-UBT firmly asserted that elections should not have been announced until the final voter lists of all municipal corporations, including the BMC, are made public and any discrepancies are addressed.
Additionally, they called for the SEC to demonstrate its impartiality and ensure adherence to the previously stated schedule.
Meanwhile, Ashish Shelar, the Mumbai District Guardian Minister and BJP representative for the BMC elections, criticized the Shiv Sena-UBT. He urged them to provide Mumbaikars with a clear breakdown of the Rs 1.25 lakh crore spent over the past five terms of the BMC, questioning how much of it truly benefited citizens and how much ended up in private pockets.