Why Did the SC Judge Withdraw from Hearing Partha Chatterjee's Bail Request?

Click to start listening
Why Did the SC Judge Withdraw from Hearing Partha Chatterjee's Bail Request?

Synopsis

In a recent turn of events, a Supreme Court judge has recused himself from the bail hearing of former West Bengal Education Minister Partha Chatterjee. This case, revolving around a significant cash-for-school job scandal, continues to unfold, raising questions about justice and accountability in the education sector.

Key Takeaways

  • Supreme Court judge recused from a significant case.
  • Partha Chatterjee is central to the cash-for-school job scandal.
  • CBI and ED are investigating the alleged corruption.
  • 25,753 jobs were annulled due to irregularities.
  • Judicial impartiality remains crucial in high-stakes cases.

New Delhi, July 17 (NationPress) A Supreme Court judge took a step back on Thursday from addressing a bail request made by former West Bengal Education Minister and ex-Trinamool Congress secretary general Partha Chatterjee, who is seeking release in relation to the multi-crore cash-for-school job scandal.

Following Justice Joymala Bagchi's recusal, the bench led by Justice Surya Kant referred the case to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), who oversees the roster, for the bail petition to be reassigned to a different panel.

Previously, a bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh had issued a notice regarding Chatterjee's bail request and solicited a response from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

In a directive issued on May 8, the apex court mandated the West Bengal government to make a decision on granting prosecution sanction within a two-week timeframe, allowing the trial proceedings against Chatterjee and other accused state government employees to commence in the school job cases being investigated by the Central anti-corruption agency.

Both the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) have been conducting simultaneous investigations into the school job cases.

In their charge sheets, both the ED and CBI identified Chatterjee as the principal architect of the alleged cash-for-school job scam.

Chatterjee was initially apprehended by the ED at his residence in South Kolkata in July 2022, and since then, he has remained in custody.

Subsequently, the CBI also recorded his arrest.

In April of this year, the Supreme Court upheld a ruling from the Calcutta High Court, which annulled 25,753 teaching (secondary and higher secondary) and non-teaching positions in state-run schools, linked to the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) for 2016.

The court agreed with the argument that the entire panel needed to be invalidated due to the state government's and the commission's failure to distinguish between the 'genuine' candidates and those deemed 'tainted.'

Point of View

The recusal of the Supreme Court judge in this high-profile case underscores the complexities of judicial proceedings and the importance of impartiality. It raises critical questions regarding political influence and the integrity of the legal system in handling corruption cases in education.
NationPress
17/07/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What led to the judge's recusal?
The judge recused himself from the hearing to maintain impartiality in a case involving a high-profile political figure.
What is the cash-for-school job case?
It is a significant corruption scandal involving the alleged manipulation of job placements in West Bengal's educational institutions.
What actions have the CBI and ED taken in this case?
Both agencies are conducting parallel investigations, with Chatterjee being identified as a key player in the alleged scam.
When was Partha Chatterjee arrested?
He was first arrested by the ED in July 2022 and has since been in custody.
What was the Supreme Court's recent ruling regarding job cancellations?
The Supreme Court upheld the annulment of over 25,000 teaching and non-teaching jobs linked to the West Bengal School Service Commission.