Should the Mullaperiyar Dam be Decommissioned?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
New Delhi, Oct 13 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has issued directives for notices to be sent to both the Central government and the State of Tamil Nadu regarding a petition that calls for the decommissioning of the century-old Mullaperiyar dam located in Kerala, along with the proposal to construct a new dam at the same site.
This petition was brought forth by a Kerala-based organization, Save Kerala Brigade, and was addressed by the Bench led by Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran.
Chief Justice Gavai noted that the Mullaperiyar dam is among the oldest dams in the country.
Senior Advocate V Giri, representing the petitioners, echoed this concern, stating that the dam is approximately 130 years old.
He highlighted the critical issues surrounding the dam, expressing that, "The lives of around 10 million people are at stake due to its potential risks."
He further insisted, "You need to clarify what the specific issues are, especially considering the implications for Tamil Nadu's water supply if a new dam is constructed."
The Mullaperiyar Dam, built by the British over a century ago, has been a contentious topic between Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
While Kerala has persistently raised alarms about safety due to the dam’s age and possible structural weaknesses, Tamil Nadu argues that the dam remains structurally sound and secure.
Despite the dam being situated within Kerala's borders, the reservoir's water plays a crucial role for Tamil Nadu, supporting five districts within the state.
A pivotal ruling by the Supreme Court in 2014 affirmed Tamil Nadu’s stance, declaring the dam safe while instructing that the water level in the reservoir be maintained at 142 feet.
The Court also formed a supervisory committee to ensure the effective management of the dam.
Tamil Nadu has continuously advocated for the dam's safety and has sought enhancements to its structure.
Conversely, Kerala has remained firm in its position, arguing that the dam poses a significant threat and should ultimately be decommissioned, thus perpetuating the dispute despite previous Supreme Court interventions and existing supervisory measures.
In light of these ongoing tensions, a new directive has been issued by the apex court.