UPI small charge could make digital payments self-sustaining: NITI Aayog
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
NITI Aayog Vice Chairman Ashok Kumar Lahiri on Wednesday, 16 September said a small levy on select UPI transactions could render India's digital payments ecosystem financially self-sustaining, provided the charge is kept as low as possible to protect consumers. His remarks, made in New Delhi, reignite a long-running debate over whether UPI — the world's most-used real-time payments rail — can continue to operate without a revenue model.
The Case for a UPI Levy
Lahiri invoked the 'user-pays principle', arguing that businesses derive substantial value from digital payments by avoiding the cost and inconvenience of depositing cheques and handling cash. He urged policymakers to introduce a levy, however small, to put UPI on a commercially viable footing.
'Try to make it as little as possible, but please levy it so that UPI becomes a self-sustaining business,' Lahiri said when asked whether charging for UPI payments above ₹2,000 could dampen digital payment adoption in India.
Industry Perspective: Consumers and Small Merchants Exempt
BillDesk Director and Co-founder Srinivasu MN offered critical design detail: the proposed charge would not apply to consumers or low-value merchant transactions. According to him, the levy would target only a limited set of transactions exceeding ₹2,000, with concessional rates carved out for routine payments such as utility bills, government tax payments, insurance premiums, and fuel purchases.
Srinivasu also proposed that a portion of the merchant discount rate (MDR) be channelled into a dedicated fund to support UPI expansion, particularly among small merchants who remain the most price-sensitive segment of the ecosystem.
India's UPI Scale — and the Gap That Remains
India has crossed 500 million UPI users, and the country already accounts for more than half of the world's retail digital transactions, making it a global leader in the space. Yet Srinivasu noted that significant headroom remains: the existing user base represents a fraction of India's total population, and further investment in fraud protection and consumer education will be needed as the system scales.
This comes amid growing pressure on banks and payment service providers, who have long absorbed UPI infrastructure costs without a recovery mechanism since the government abolished MDR on UPI transactions in 2020.
Export Diversification: A Parallel Call to Industry
Separately, Lahiri urged Indian businesses to proactively identify viable export markets as the country seeks to diversify trade amid uncertainty in key destinations such as the United States. He said the private sector — not the government — should determine where Indian products can find demand, citing opportunities across Africa, Latin America, East Asia, and Australia.
'The world is large,' Lahiri remarked, while acknowledging he did not have a prescriptive answer on which markets businesses should target. With both the UPI monetisation debate and export strategy discussions gaining momentum, the pressure on India's policy establishment to deliver durable frameworks on both fronts is mounting.