Has the court set a hearing date for the ‘Udaipur Files’ case?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- ‘Udaipur Files’ highlights the complexities surrounding freedom of expression.
- The film's subject matter has sparked widespread debate.
- Legal battles continue to challenge the film's release.
- Accusations of communal vilification are central to the controversy.
- The film features significant characters from diverse backgrounds.
Mumbai, July 16 (NationPress) Amit Jani, the director of the forthcoming film ‘Udaipur Files’, has announced that the court has scheduled a hearing for the case on Monday.
‘Udaipur Files’ centers around the assassination of Udaipur tailor Kanhaiya Kumar, who lost his life for allegedly posting a social media message in favor of Indian politician and BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma, whose remarks sparked the significant 2022 Muhammad controversy.
One of the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case, Javed, has approached the Supreme Court to challenge the film's release.
Amit informed IANS, “The court has set the date for Monday, and we are awaiting the judgment regarding the appeal filed by Madni. We are in anticipation, and our legal representative will provide further details. The CBFC has issued us a censor certificate and has requested us to meet with them.”
The Central Board of Film Certification mandated 150 cuts in the film; however, this issue remains under litigation.
Mohd Rizwan Ahmad, representing Amit Jani, stated that when the respondents sought a petition from the High Court, the court promptly granted a stay and directed them to appeal to the Government of India's Revision Provisions 6A.
He elaborated, “Following their appeal, a committee was established. At 2:30 PM, the committee convened for the first time to deliberate on the case, resulting in 55 cuts already made due to requests from co-accused individuals. The Supreme Court indicated that since the High Court provided its directive and the petitioners complied, and the Government of India formed a committee, this matter will remain pending without interference for the time being.”
He continued, “Gaurav Bhatia ji argued on technical grounds while Kapil Sibal claimed that this is a highly inflammatory film that maligns the entire Muslim community and portrays them as criminals. I had to convey my perspective that first and foremost, the nation must differentiate between religion and community.”
“In brief, I explained in 11 words the essence of Islam. I asserted that the film does not vilify the 11 aspects of Islam. Regarding the community, I clarified that neither I nor my father is depicted as a criminal. Additionally, the film features at least 7-8 characters shown as Muslims, two of whom were killed while trying to uphold humanity. I informed the court that a notable dialogue in the film states, ‘Now the Muslims of India will no longer heed the discussions from Pakistan,’” he added.