Delhi HC orders takedown of 'Kala Hiran' links in Salman Khan rights case

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Delhi HC orders takedown of 'Kala Hiran' links in Salman Khan rights case

Synopsis

The Delhi High Court didn't just order a takedown — it told producer Amit Jani he 'seems to think he is above the law.' With promotional links for 'Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy' pulled from X and YouTube, Salman Khan's personality rights petition is shaping up as a landmark test of how Indian courts handle films inspired by a living celebrity's controversies.

Key Takeaways

The Delhi High Court on 27 July ordered removal of 'Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy' links from X and YouTube .
The court sharply rebuked producer Amit Jani , saying he appeared to believe he was 'above the law.' The film's teaser, released on 17 July , reportedly references Salman Khan's 1998 blackbuck poaching case and his alleged rivalry with gangster Lawrence Bishnoi .
Jani's counsel argued the teaser names no one and contains no deepfake or AI-generated content.
Khan's counsel told the court he has been acquitted in three of four cases referenced, with the sentence in the fourth stayed.
The case is emerging as a significant test of personality rights law for living public figures in India.

The Delhi High Court on 27 July directed the removal of social media links promoting the upcoming film 'Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy' from X (formerly Twitter) and YouTube, acting on a petition filed by actor Salman Khan over alleged violations of his personality rights. The court's order came during a hearing that saw the bench sharply rebuke the film's producer.

Court's Rebuke to the Producer

The Delhi High Court pulled up film producer Amit Jani, noting that he appeared to be drawing confidence from the absence of any order in the previous hearing. The bench told Jani directly: 'You seem to think you are above the law. Things are only getting worse day by day. You cannot do this even to an ordinary citizen.'

The court's remarks signal an escalating tone of judicial impatience, suggesting that Jani's conduct since the last hearing had not helped his case.

What the Producer's Side Argued

Jani's counsel pushed back, contending that the content in question was merely a teaser and did not explicitly name Salman Khan. 'This is only a teaser. How does it violate Salman Khan's personality rights? I am not even taking his name,' the counsel submitted.

The defence further argued that the teaser contained no deepfake or AI-generated footage, and invoked the principle that there is no legal protection over public events or public performances.

Salman Khan's Submissions

Counsel for Salman Khan told the court that in three of the four legal cases referenced in the teaser, Khan had been acquitted, while the sentence in the fourth case had been stayed. The counsel argued that the teaser was designed to inflame sentiment against Khan within a specific community — a claim the court appeared to take seriously given the direction that followed.

About the Film and Its Controversy

The film 'Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy' is directed by Bharat S. Shrinet and produced by Amit Jani. Its teaser, unveiled on 17 July, was laden with references to Khan's films 'Dabangg' and 'Sikander'. The film is reportedly inspired by Salman Khan's 1998 blackbuck poaching case — which involves the alleged illegal hunting of two endangered blackbucks in October 1998 during the filming of 'Hum Saath-Saath Hain' near Jodhpur, Rajasthan — and reportedly portrays his alleged rivalry with gangster Lawrence Bishnoi.

What Happens Next

With the court ordering the removal of promotional links, the film's digital rollout faces an immediate setback. The matter is likely to be heard again, with the court's patience with the producer visibly wearing thin. The case is being watched as a significant test of personality rights jurisprudence in India, particularly around how courts treat biographical or inspired films involving living public figures.

Point of View

Suggesting the bench views the producer's conduct as deliberate rather than inadvertent. The deeper legal question the case forces is whether a film 'inspired by' real events, without naming its subject, can still infringe personality rights. Indian courts have yet to draw a clear line here, and this case may compel one. The timing also matters: with the Lawrence Bishnoi threat against Salman Khan an active public-safety concern, a film that reportedly dramatises that alleged rivalry carries stakes beyond copyright or reputation law.
NationPress
27 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Delhi High Court order in the Salman Khan 'Kala Hiran' case?
The Delhi High Court directed the removal of social media links related to the film 'Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy' from X (formerly Twitter) and YouTube. The order came on 27 July during a hearing on Salman Khan's personality rights petition against the film.
What is 'Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy' about?
The film is reportedly inspired by Salman Khan's 1998 blackbuck poaching case and allegedly portrays his rivalry with gangster Lawrence Bishnoi. It is directed by Bharat S. Shrinet and produced by Amit Jani, with its teaser released on 17 July.
What is Salman Khan's blackbuck poaching case?
The case involves the alleged illegal hunting of two endangered blackbucks in October 1998 during the filming of 'Hum Saath-Saath Hain' near Jodhpur, Rajasthan. According to Khan's counsel, he has been acquitted in three of the four related legal cases, with the sentence in the fourth case currently stayed.
What arguments did the film producer's side make in court?
Producer Amit Jani's counsel argued that the teaser does not name Salman Khan, contains no deepfake or AI-generated content, and that there is no legal protection over public events or public performances. The counsel described the content as 'only a teaser.'
Why does this case matter beyond Salman Khan?
The case is being closely watched as a test of personality rights law in India, particularly regarding how courts treat films inspired by real events involving living public figures. The outcome could set a precedent for how biographical or semi-fictional films are regulated.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 7 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google