Will the Madras HC Judge Approve 'Manushi' Amidst Censor Board Controversy?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The Madras High Court will review 'Manushi' amid a dispute with the CBFC.
- The film faces demands for 37 cuts by the censor board.
- Justice Venkatesh will personally watch the film to assess the CBFC's objections.
- This case could have significant ramifications for censorship in Indian cinema.
- The film tackles serious issues, including custodial torture.
Chennai, Aug 19 (NationPress) In a remarkable move, the Madras High Court is set to review the Tamil film 'Manushi' amidst a contentious dispute between its producers and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).
Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, while hearing a petition from the film's producer, C. Vetri Maaran, ordered a private screening on August 24 in Chennai to assess the validity of the censor board's demand for 37 cuts.
The film, created by Vetri Maaran's Grassroot Film Company and directed by Gopi Nainar, who previously directed 'Aramm', features Andrea Jeremiah in the lead role.
It addresses the issue of custodial torture inflicted on a woman suspected of terrorism, a topic that caught public attention following the trailer's release by actor Vijay Sethupathi in April 2024.
The controversy began in September 2024 when both the examining and reviewing committees of the CBFC denied a censor certificate.
They raised objections regarding the film's portrayal of the State in a negative light and claimed it blurred the lines between leftist communism and mainstream communism.
The rejection was contested by Vetri Maaran in June, through a writ petition alleging the CBFC acted without transparency by failing to provide him a chance to defend the film or specify its objections.
He also requested the formation of an expert panel, including human rights activists, to reassess the film.
During the hearing of that earlier petition, the High Court recorded the CBFC's statement that it had re-evaluated the film and identified objectionable sequences.
The court disposed of the petition in June, allowing the producer to seek further legal recourse.
However, Vetri Maaran returned with a new petition, contending that the board's objections were excessive and arbitrary.
He highlighted that even innocuous dialogues, such as the colloquial term 'saniyan', had been marked for removal, which he argued violated the CBFC's guidelines.
Responding to these allegations, Justice Venkatesh stated that the only way forward was to personally view the film alongside the CBFC members to validate their objections.
He ordered the screening to take place at a private theatre on Dr. D.G.S. Dhinakaran Salai (formerly Greenways Road) and instructed senior central government panel counsel A. Kumaraguru to ensure the attendance of CBFC officials.
The High Court's intervention in this censor dispute paves the way for an extraordinary judicial examination of 'Manushi'.
The outcome of this screening could not only determine the film's release but also influence broader discussions on censorship and creative freedom within Indian cinema.