Bangladesh jails 14-year-old student under Anti-Terrorism Act, Awami League cries foul

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Bangladesh jails 14-year-old student under Anti-Terrorism Act, Awami League cries foul

Synopsis

A 14-year-old Class 10 student in Lakshmipur, Bangladesh, has been jailed under the Anti-Terrorism Act after a court rejected his humanitarian bail plea — despite his name and age being incorrectly recorded in the original police case. The Awami League is calling it a deliberate abuse of anti-terror law against a minor, raising serious questions about procedural integrity and political targeting.

Key Takeaways

Rimon , a 14-year-old Class 10 student from Ramgati, Lakshmipur , has been sent to jail under Bangladesh's Anti-Terrorism Act .
He was arrested on 2 August ; his humanitarian bail application was rejected by the court.
The original police case listed him as 'Bachchu Prakash Ripon' , aged 19 — details that did not match his birth certificate.
The case was filed on 4 June against 12 individuals over a Chhatra League procession held on 30 May .
The Awami League has condemned the arrest as an 'abuse of power' and 'blatant interference in the justice system.'

A Bangladeshi court has sent 14-year-old schoolboy Md. Rimon, a Class 10 student at Char Mehar Azizia High School in Ramgati upazila of Lakshmipur district, to jail after he was produced before a judge in a case registered under the country's Anti-Terrorism Act, according to local media reports. The development, which came to light on 5 August, has drawn sharp condemnation from the Awami League, which accused authorities of weaponising anti-terror legislation against a minor.

How the Case Unfolded

Police arrested Rimon from the Char Mehar area on the afternoon of 2 August, according to case documents cited by Bangladeshi outlet NTV Online. The original case statement, however, identified him as 'Bachchu Prakash Ripon' and recorded his age as 19 years — details that reportedly did not match his birth certificate. The investigating officer, Sub-Inspector Mizanur Rahman, subsequently corrected the name and revised the recorded age to 13 years, 11 months and 29 days when the case was submitted to court.

The underlying case was filed on 4 June by Ramgati Police Station Sub-Inspector Moynal Hossain against 12 individuals, including Rimon, on charges of disrupting public safety and law and order. It stems from an incident on 30 May, when leaders and activists of the Awami League's student wing, Chhatra League, gathered at the Madhya Purba Alexander Government Primary School and Multipurpose Disaster Shelter in Char Algi Union, held a brief procession, raised slogans, and recorded a video of the event.

Bail Rejected, Minor Sent to Jail

Defence lawyer Abdur Rob Sumon confirmed that a humanitarian bail application filed on Rimon's behalf was rejected by the court. 'The boy is very young; he is not yet old enough to be involved in politics. According to his birth certificate, he is 14 years and 2 months old. We had filed a humanitarian bail application in court on his behalf, but the judge rejected it,' Sumon said, as reported by NTV Online.

The discrepancy between the name and age recorded in the initial police case and those on the minor's birth certificate has raised questions about procedural rigour in the arrest and documentation process.

Awami League Condemns Arrest as 'Abuse of Power'

The Awami League issued a strongly worded statement condemning the jailing, describing it as an 'abuse of power' and 'blatant interference in the justice system.' The party alleged that the Anti-Terrorism Act was being used as a 'political weapon' to imprison a tenth-grade student.

'By disregarding children's rights, the rule of law, and even the most basic human rights, the police administration, backed by those in power, is pushing the country toward extreme disorder. The incident involving 14-year-old schoolboy Rimon in Ramgati, Lakshmipur, is a terrifying reflection of this reality,' the party stated. It further alleged that 'ignoring his birth certificate, falsely recording his name and age, and subjecting a minor to repression without even the minimum legal review demonstrate that the current administration is suffering from political bankruptcy.'

Broader Context and What Comes Next

The case has drawn attention to concerns about the use of broad anti-terror provisions against individuals — including minors — in contexts that critics argue are political rather than security-related. This is not the first time Bangladesh's Anti-Terrorism Act has faced scrutiny for its application in cases involving political affiliations. Rights groups have previously flagged the law's wide scope as susceptible to misuse.

With the bail application already rejected, Rimon's legal team is expected to pursue further remedies. The case is likely to intensify political tensions between the Awami League and the current administration, and may draw scrutiny from child rights organisations operating in Bangladesh.

Point of View

This is a failure at multiple levels: the arresting officer, the investigating officer who quietly revised the records, and the court that rejected a humanitarian bail plea for a minor. Bangladesh's Anti-Terrorism Act, like similar broad-scope laws elsewhere in South Asia, has long faced criticism for enabling overreach. The Awami League's condemnation carries its own political weight, but the underlying legal and child-rights concerns deserve independent scrutiny regardless of which party raises them.
NationPress
6 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Md. Rimon and why was he arrested?
Md. Rimon is a 14-year-old Class 10 student at Char Mehar Azizia High School in Ramgati, Lakshmipur, Bangladesh. He was arrested on 2 August as one of 12 individuals named in a case filed under the Anti-Terrorism Act over a Chhatra League procession held on 30 May.
Why was Rimon's bail rejected?
The court rejected a humanitarian bail application filed by defence lawyer Abdur Rob Sumon, despite arguments that Rimon is a minor aged 14 years and 2 months according to his birth certificate. No detailed judicial reasoning has been publicly reported.
What discrepancies were found in the police case documents?
The original case statement identified Rimon as 'Bachchu Prakash Ripon' and listed his age as 19 years — both of which reportedly did not match his birth certificate. The investigating officer later corrected the name and revised the age to 13 years, 11 months and 29 days before submitting the case to court.
What has the Awami League said about the arrest?
The Awami League condemned the arrest as an 'abuse of power' and 'blatant interference in the justice system,' alleging the Anti-Terrorism Act is being used as a political weapon. The party said ignoring a minor's birth certificate and falsely recording his identity reflects 'political bankruptcy' in the current administration.
What happens next in Rimon's case?
With the bail application rejected, Rimon's legal team is expected to pursue further legal remedies. The case is likely to face scrutiny from child rights organisations and may escalate political tensions between the Awami League and Bangladesh's current administration.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 8 months ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google