CPJ urges Pakistan to lift PEMRA ban on live attack coverage

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
CPJ urges Pakistan to lift PEMRA ban on live attack coverage

Synopsis

Pakistan's media regulator PEMRA has ordered all satellite TV channels to stop airing live coverage of terrorist attacks and other 'unpleasant' incidents — only state-verified information is permitted. The CPJ has condemned the directive as a potential system of official censorship, warning it strips newsrooms of editorial independence at the exact moment it matters most.

Key Takeaways

PEMRA has directed all satellite TV channels in Pakistan to stop live broadcasts of explosions, blasts, shootings, and terrorist attacks .
Channels may only air content verified by government departments or law enforcement agencies , and must use time delays.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has called on Pakistani authorities to withdraw the directive, warning it risks becoming a tool of state censorship.
The current order reiterates restrictions first issued in February 2023 by PEMRA.
In August 2026 , Pakistan separately required foreign journalists to register with the Ministry of Information before reporting outside Islamabad, Lahore, and Karachi .
The directive follows the imposition of emergency rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province amid heightened political and security instability.

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), a New York-based independent nonprofit promoting press freedom globally, has called on Pakistani authorities to withdraw sweeping restrictions that bar television channels from broadcasting live coverage of terrorist attacks and other vaguely defined 'unpleasant' incidents. The appeal, issued on 13 October 2026, comes in direct response to a directive by Pakistan's Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) that critics say effectively hands the state control over breaking news.

What the PEMRA Directive Orders

According to the directive, all satellite television channels in Pakistan have been instructed to refrain from broadcasting, rebroadcasting, or airing live coverage of any 'unfortunate' or 'unpleasant' incident — a category that explicitly includes explosions, blasts, shootings, and terrorist attacks. Broadcasters may only air information that has been verified by the relevant government departments or law enforcement agencies.

The order additionally requires channels to use time delays and maintain independent editorial boards. PEMRA has warned of legal action against any broadcaster that fails to comply, raising the stakes significantly for newsrooms already operating under pressure.

CPJ's Warning Against State-Controlled Narratives

'Journalists and media workers must be able to report breaking news and current affairs independently, free from fear of legal retaliation, and in the public interest,' the CPJ stated in a formal release.

Waliullah Rahmani, CPJ's Afghanistan and Pakistan representative, sharpened the criticism: 'Preventing journalists from independent reporting of major security incidents and requiring them to rely on information authorised by state and security agencies risks turning legitimate safety safeguards into a system of official information control and censorship.' He called on Pakistani authorities to rescind the restrictions and allow newsrooms to make responsible editorial decisions without fear of regulatory retaliation.

A Pattern of Tightening Media Controls

The current directive is not an isolated development. According to the CPJ, it reiterates restrictions on television channels that were first issued in February 2023 by PEMRA, which at the time accused TV channels of broadcasting unverified and speculative information during militant attacks. This marks at least the second formal reinforcement of those curbs.

In August 2026, Pakistan's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting issued separate guidelines requiring foreign journalists and their associates — including those working with international media — to register with the ministry and obtain a certificate before undertaking reporting assignments outside Islamabad, Lahore, and Karachi. Taken together, the measures indicate a sustained and escalating effort to regulate news flows, particularly around security events.

Political Context Behind the Clampdown

The CPJ noted that the latest directive follows a period of heightened political and security instability in Pakistan, including the imposition of emergency rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. The combination of provincial emergency powers and centralised media controls has deepened concerns among press freedom advocates about the operating environment for journalists in the country.

Pakistan's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting did not respond to a CPJ request for comment, according to the organisation. As pressure mounts internationally, observers say the next test will be whether PEMRA enforces penalties against any broadcaster — a step that would signal the directive is operational policy rather than regulatory posturing.

Point of View

But for how it restricts: by making state and law-enforcement verification a prerequisite for broadcast, it institutionalises official narrative control at precisely the moments — attacks, blasts, security crises — when independent journalism matters most. The vagueness of terms like 'unpleasant' gives regulators enormous discretionary power, a classic tool of soft censorship. That this is at minimum the second iteration of the same rules since 2023, compounded by the August foreign-journalist registration requirement and emergency rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, suggests a systematic rather than reactive tightening. Pakistan's press freedom ranking has been in steady decline on global indices; this directive is unlikely to reverse that trend.
NationPress
17 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What has PEMRA ordered Pakistan's TV channels to do?
PEMRA has directed all satellite television channels in Pakistan to stop broadcasting live coverage of 'unfortunate' or 'unpleasant' incidents, a category that includes explosions, blasts, shootings, and terrorist attacks. Channels may only air information verified by government departments or law enforcement agencies, and must use time delays.
Why has the CPJ condemned the PEMRA directive?
The CPJ argues that requiring journalists to rely solely on state-authorised information during major security incidents risks turning safety guidelines into a system of official censorship. It says the restrictions undermine editorial independence and expose broadcasters to legal retaliation for independent reporting.
Is this the first time PEMRA has imposed such restrictions?
No. According to the CPJ, the current directive reiterates restrictions first issued by PEMRA in February 2023, when the regulator accused TV channels of broadcasting unverified information during militant attacks. The latest order is at least the second formal reinforcement of those curbs.
What other media restrictions has Pakistan introduced recently?
In August 2026, Pakistan's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting issued guidelines requiring foreign journalists and those working with international media to register with the ministry and obtain a certificate before reporting outside Islamabad, Lahore, and Karachi.
What is the broader context for these media restrictions in Pakistan?
The CPJ links the latest directive to heightened political and security instability, including the imposition of emergency rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Pakistan's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting did not respond to a CPJ request for comment on the matter.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 11 hours ago
  2. Yesterday
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 6 months ago
  8. 11 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google