Do Proceedings Meet Fair Trial Standards? HRW Raises Concerns Over Hasina Verdict
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Human Rights Watch has voiced significant concerns regarding the death sentences for Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, highlighting violations of fair trial rights. This situation raises questions about justice and accountability in Bangladesh amidst ongoing political unrest.
Key Takeaways
- HRW highlights serious human rights concerns over death sentences in Bangladesh.
- Both Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal were prosecuted in absentia.
- Fair trial standards were reportedly not met during the proceedings.
- Impartial investigations and credible trials are essential for accountability.
- The role of the interim government is crucial in ensuring the rights of the accused are protected.
New York, Nov 18 (NationPress) Human Rights Watch (HRW), a US-based advocacy organization, has expressed grave concerns regarding human rights following the death sentences handed down to former Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina, and former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal. The organization noted that both individuals were tried in absentia and were not allowed to choose their own legal representation.
This statement was issued after the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) in Bangladesh sentenced the former Prime Minister to death for her involvement in alleged "crimes against humanity" during protests in July 2024.
The ICT also convicted two of Hasina's senior aides, sentencing Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal to death and former Inspector General of Police Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun, who testified for the state, to five years in prison.
Meenakshi Ganguly, Deputy Asia Director at HRW, stated, "There is persistent anger and distress in Bangladesh regarding Hasina's oppressive governance, yet all legal processes must adhere to international fair trial standards. Those accountable for the severe violations during Hasina's tenure must face justice through impartial investigations and credible trials."
HRW emphasized that the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus should implement safeguards to protect the fundamental rights of the accused.
According to HRW, while accountability for abuses is essential, the prosecution did not uphold international fair trial standards, failing to provide a complete chance for the defense to present their case, question the accusers, or secure representation of their choice.
"Trials in absentia fundamentally compromise the right to a fair trial as outlined in article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which is vital for a legitimate judicial process," HRW asserted.
The UN Human Rights Committee has indicated that to protect defendants' rights, "all criminal proceedings must allow the accused the opportunity for an oral hearing, where they can appear in person or through counsel, present evidence, and examine witnesses."
Ganguly concluded, "Victims of severe rights violations under the Hasina administration deserve justice and reparations through genuinely independent and fair proceedings. Ensuring justice also involves safeguarding the rights of the accused, including the elimination of the death penalty, which is inherently inhumane and irreversible."
Point of View
It is imperative to acknowledge the ongoing human rights discourse in Bangladesh. While the pursuit of justice for past abuses is essential, it must not come at the cost of undermining fair trial norms. The integrity of the judicial process is paramount, and it is crucial that all parties involved are afforded their fundamental rights.
NationPress
18/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main concerns raised by HRW regarding the trials?
HRW expresses concerns about the lack of fair trial standards, particularly the denial of proper legal representation and the trials conducted in absentia.
Who are the individuals facing death sentences?
Former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal are the two individuals facing death sentences.
What does HRW suggest for the interim government?
HRW urges the interim government to adopt measures to protect the fundamental rights of the accused and ensure fair trial standards.
What international standard is being referenced regarding fair trials?
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) outlines the rights to a fair trial, including the right to legal representation and an opportunity to present a defense.
What is the stance on the death penalty according to HRW?
HRW argues for the abolition of the death penalty, stating it is inherently cruel and irreversible.
