Why Did Bangladesh ICT Deny Lawyer's Plea for Sheikh Hasina's Representation?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a controversial ruling, the Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal has rejected a plea for legal representation for Sheikh Hasina in a politically charged case. Critics argue this decision undermines justice and highlights the struggle for democratic legitimacy in the country. Explore the implications of this ruling and the broader political context surrounding it.
Key Takeaways
- The ICT denied Z.I. Khan Panna's representation request for Sheikh Hasina.
- Experts criticize the ruling as a denial of justice.
- Charges against Hasina are linked to last year’s protests.
- The Awami League claims the charges are politically motivated.
- Concerns grow over the legitimacy of the current government.
Dhaka, Aug 12 (NationPress) The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) of Bangladesh has turned down the request from senior Supreme Court lawyer Z.I. Khan Panna to represent former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in a case concerning crimes against humanity linked to the protests of July last year.
Experts believe this ruling is a significant injustice, effectively stripping Hasina of her right to legal representation in this matter.
The application was submitted by lawyer Nazneen Nahar on behalf of Panna to defend Hasina, according to reports from local media.
During a testimony phase, the tribunal raised questions about the intent behind the application, asserting that it could not be accepted.
"The train has already left the station; there is no way to board it by informing the station master. At this stage of the case, there is no opportunity to appoint a new lawyer," leading Bangladeshi daily The Business Standard cited the ICT's response to the petition.
The tribunal pointed out that the state has already designated Supreme Court lawyer Amir Hossain to represent Hasina.
On August 3, the ICT's prosecution commenced proceedings against Hasina and two other individuals concerning alleged crimes against humanity.
The co-defendants include former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal and former Inspector General of Police (IGP) Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun.
In response to the proceedings, the Awami League condemned the charges against its leaders, labeling them as a "politically motivated" scheme by the "illegitimate" interim government led by Muhammad Yunus.
Awami League leader Mohammad A. Arafat stated that neither he nor former Prime Minister Hasina had received any formal notification regarding the trial against party members, underscoring the "absurdity" of the "unelected" government.
"This is part of a wider campaign by an unelected usurper heading an illegitimate government, determined to erase democratic legitimacy, silence opposition, and maintain power. Such a regime lacks the legal or moral authority to prosecute a government elected by the people's mandate. An illegitimate regime cannot alter legislation passed by Parliament. Only Parliament holds that authority," Arafat asserted in a statement.
He emphasized that no democratically elected leader should face prosecution for fulfilling constitutional responsibilities amid violent uprisings.
Point of View
It's crucial to recognize the delicate balance between justice and political power in Bangladesh. The ICT's decision raises questions about the fairness of legal proceedings in a politically charged environment. Our commitment remains with the nation's democratic principles and ensuring that every voice is heard in the pursuit of justice.
NationPress
19/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the reason for rejecting the lawyer's plea?
The ICT stated that it was too late in the proceedings to appoint a new lawyer, indicating the application could not be accepted.
Who is representing Sheikh Hasina now?
The state has appointed Supreme Court lawyer Amir Hossain to represent Sheikh Hasina in the ongoing case.
What are the charges against Sheikh Hasina?
Sheikh Hasina is facing allegations of crimes against humanity linked to the protests that occurred in July of the previous year.
How has the Awami League responded to the charges?
The Awami League has denounced the charges as politically motivated, claiming they are part of a broader campaign by an illegitimate government.
What are the broader implications of this ruling?
The ruling raises concerns about the integrity of legal processes and the potential impact on Bangladesh's democracy and political stability.
