Is India’s Trade Stance with the U.S. 'Good and Disciplined'?

Click to start listening
Is India’s Trade Stance with the U.S. 'Good and Disciplined'?

Synopsis

Raymond Vickery, a former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Commerce, highlights India's diplomatic approach amid U.S. tensions. His insights reveal a careful balance and strategic pragmatism that may redefine U.S.-India relations. Discover how India's recent diplomatic moves can reshape its international partnerships.

Key Takeaways

  • India's trade approach is seen as disciplined and well-structured.
  • The U.S. Trade Representative acknowledges India's pragmatic stance in negotiations.
  • Concerns arise over the potential impact of U.S.-China relations on India's strategic interests.
  • Heavy tariffs could redirect India's partnerships towards alternatives like Russia and China.
  • There is an opportunity for India to step up in the global diplomatic landscape.

Washington, Oct 3 (NationPress) Raymond Vickery, a former US Assistant Secretary of Commerce for trade development, has praised India's cautious strategy amidst the recent tensions with the United States.

In a unique interview with IANS in Washington, Vickery, who serves as a Senior Associate and Chair on India and Emerging Asia Economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), described India's position as "good and disciplined."

“Credit goes to the policymakers from [Prime Minister] Modi, (External Affairs Minister) Jaishankar, and others for their commendable discipline in communication. Rather than reacting impulsively, they have adopted a well-structured and disciplined approach,” he remarked.

On Tuesday, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer also characterized India's stance in trade discussions as "pragmatic" and noted that both nations are "working to negotiate a deal."

During a discussion at the Economic Club of New York on Tuesday, Greer emphasized the ongoing negotiations with India.

“The Indian negotiators are being pragmatic. Since the start of this administration, we have been engaged in discussions related to trade. Regarding a 50 percent tariff on India, it's important to note that half of that, 25 percent, is tied to trade-related issues. We are actively seeking to reach an agreement,” he elaborated.

Vickery, who is also a Senior Advisor at Albright Stonebridge Group, pointed out that the last nine months of the Trump administration have negatively impacted bilateral relations.

“In the past eight to nine months, the dynamics of international relations between the U.S. and India have regressed, marking a setback,” he observed.

The former senior commerce department official emphasized the multifaceted India-U.S. engagement in areas like technology, military, health, and energy, but cautioned that Trump’s "transactional approach" could jeopardize cooperation in various sectors.

“If this transactional stance persists, it may hinder the overall engagement between the U.S. and India,” he warned.

Vickery also commented on the Indian Prime Minister’s visit to China in August for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit, indicating New Delhi's search for "alternative partners."

India is clearly exploring other partnerships, including with Russia, China, and BRICS. The heavy-handed approach of these tariffs drives India towards China, Russia, and other alternatives to the U.S. relationship,” he mentioned.

Commenting on the Trump administration’s unclear stance on its strategy with China, Vickery suggested that while the ambiguity might benefit India in the short term, it poses long-term challenges.

“This situation may temporarily favor India, as both India and China find themselves in similar predicaments. However, in the long run, India faces significant challenges regarding China,” he remarked.

He cautioned that a potential future U.S.-China “grand bargain” could adversely affect India's strategic interests.

“It’s entirely possible that in pursuit of a grand bargain between the U.S. and China, the U.S. may compromise on certain security interests of India, particularly concerning maritime freedoms,” he noted.

However, Vickery expressed hope that New Delhi would seize the chance to fill the "power vacuum" created by the Trump administration's "America First" policy.

“I hope India recognizes the diplomatic vacuum left by this administration and steps up in line with its democratic values, fostering cooperation on economic development and expanding its global role,” he concluded.

Point of View

It's crucial to acknowledge the significant strides India is making in maintaining a disciplined trade approach with the U.S. This perspective not only emphasizes India's growing influence but also highlights the necessity of strategic partnerships in an ever-evolving global economy. At NationPress, we believe in supporting narratives that foster cooperation and mutual growth.
NationPress
03/10/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Raymond Vickery say about India's trade stance?
Raymond Vickery praised India's disciplined approach amid tensions with the U.S., highlighting the effective communication from Indian policymakers.
How did the USTR describe India's position?
The U.S. Trade Representative, Jamieson Greer, characterized India's trade negotiation stance as pragmatic.
What are the concerns regarding the U.S.-China relationship?
Vickery warned that a future U.S.-China 'grand bargain' could jeopardize India's strategic interests, particularly concerning maritime freedoms.
What impact could tariffs have on India's international partnerships?
Vickery indicated that heavy tariffs might push India towards strengthening ties with countries like Russia and China.
What opportunities does Vickery see for India?
Vickery expressed hope that India would fill the diplomatic vacuum created by the Trump administration's 'America First' approach.
Nation Press