Why Did Iran Condemn the US Sanctions on ICC Judges?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bold statement, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei condemned the US sanctions against ICC judges, deeming it a significant setback for US foreign policy. This move has sparked intense debate on international law and the role of the US in global justice. Discover the implications of this controversial decision.
Key Takeaways
- Iran's Foreign Ministry criticized US sanctions on ICC judges.
- Sanctions viewed as a threat to international law.
- US actions linked to Israel's alleged war crimes.
- Calls for global resistance against such measures.
- Focus on the integrity of the judicial process.
Tehran, June 9 (NationPress) Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baghaei, has sharply criticized the recent decision by the US to impose sanctions on judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC), labeling it a "new low" for US foreign policy.
In a post on the social media platform X, Baghaei expressed his disapproval following the US government's announcement on Thursday, which targeted four ICC judges. This action was taken in response to the tribunal's issuance of an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a previous decision to examine alleged war crimes committed by US forces in Afghanistan.
Baghaei remarked that the US government's initiative to "sanction and harass ICC judges and personnel for adhering to their judicial mandate" represents a "new low", even for a system that heavily relies on coercion and intimidation to push its foreign policy agenda.
He also noted that the United States continues to misuse its power, connecting it to Washington's recent vote against a United Nations Security Council resolution aimed at halting "genocide" in Gaza, as reported by Xinhua news agency.
Baghaei emphasized that the sanctions against ICC judges render the United States the most "enduring and persistent accomplice" in "Israeli crimes in Gaza."
He called on the international community to resist such "barbarism that threatens the very foundation of international law and undermines the fundamental principles of humanity."
According to a statement from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the sanctions targeted Solomy Balungi Bossa from Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza from Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou from Benin, and Beti Hohler from Slovenia.
Point of View
It is crucial to approach this issue through a lens of impartiality. The sanctions imposed by the US raise significant questions regarding the integrity of international judicial processes and the implications for global governance. The importance of dialogue and cooperation in addressing such complex matters cannot be overstated.
NationPress
09/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted Iran's condemnation of US sanctions?
Iran condemned the US sanctions on ICC judges as a response to the tribunal's actions against Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and inquiries into US military conduct in Afghanistan.
Who are the ICC judges affected by the sanctions?
The sanctions target Solomy Balungi Bossa from Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza from Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou from Benin, and Beti Hohler from Slovenia.
What are the broader implications of these sanctions?
These sanctions could undermine international law and create tensions between the US and other nations regarding accountability for war crimes and human rights violations.
How has the international community reacted?
The international community has been urged to oppose these actions, which some view as a challenge to the principles of justice and humanity.
What does this mean for US foreign policy?
This move reflects a troubling trend in US foreign policy, where coercion may be favored over collaboration in addressing global issues.
