Is the Snapback Mechanism for Sanctions Against Iran a Trap?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov labels the 'snapback' sanctions mechanism against Iran as a strategic trap. This article explores Lavrov's assertions on the legitimacy of the mechanism, the implications for international relations, and the ongoing dialogue between Iran and Europe amidst rising tensions.
Key Takeaways
- Lavrov's assertion: The snapback mechanism is a trap for Iran.
- Legal concerns: The E3's activation of the mechanism has been questioned.
- Potential consequences: Resuming sanctions could harm UN credibility.
- Iran's position: Iran remains open to dialogue despite tensions.
- Geopolitical dynamics: The situation reflects broader international relations issues.
United Nations, Sep 28 (NationPress) Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov described the "snapback" mechanism for sanctions targeting Iran as a trap.
This mechanism is part of UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which endorsed the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, following direct talks between the Iranian foreign minister and the then US Secretary of State. Lavrov conveyed this during a press briefing on Saturday (local time).
He stated that this mechanism deviates from standard protocols, allowing any party to propose a vote on sanctions relief, which could be unilaterally blocked by a Security Council member with veto power, thus paving the way for reinstating sanctions.
According to Lavrov, the Iranians accepted this clause under the assumption that the US would not withdraw from the deal in 2018, given his involvement in negotiating the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Post US withdrawal, Europe failed to insist that the United States adhere to its commitments, instead also retreating from the agreement, as reported by Xinhua.
Lavrov noted that the Europeans are selectively interpreting aspects of Resolution 2231, specifically targeting the exotic mechanism for snapback.
He emphasized that this mechanism serves as a trap for Iran, reinforcing the fact that Iran had no intention of breaching its nuclear deal commitments.
On Friday, the UN Security Council did not pass a resolution proposed by China and Russia that aimed to extend both the JCPOA and Resolution 2231.
Lavrov cautioned against initiating the process to restore sanctions on Iran, warning it could severely damage the credibility and authority of the United Nations.
Under Resolution 2231, sanctions prior to its adoption in 2015 would automatically resume 30 days post-notification unless countered by a Security Council resolution.
“Our aim was to renew the Iran nuclear deal in its entirety without any modifications, maintaining its integrity during the period we hoped for ongoing negotiations,” Lavrov stated, adding that Iran remains open to dialogue, possibly through mediators, with the three European participants (E3) in the nuclear deal -- Britain, France, and Germany.
Iran has recently been in talks with the E3, yet Lavrov remarked that these discussions only demonstrate that the European trio has sought any excuse to reinstate sanctions since the outset.
Recently, the E3 announced they had activated the snapback mechanism by informing the Security Council of Tehran’s "significant non-performance" on August 28.
However, the legitimacy of the E3's actions has come under scrutiny, as it bypassed the Dispute Resolution Mechanism outlined in the Iran nuclear deal and Resolution 2231.
Both Iran and Russia declared that the snapback of sanctions is legally invalid, arguing that the E3 were not positioned to activate the mechanism.
Point of View
It is crucial to approach the complexities surrounding the Iran nuclear deal with a commitment to unbiased reporting. Lavrov's insights on the snapback mechanism highlight significant geopolitical dynamics that could reshape international relationships and the authority of the United Nations. As the situation evolves, adherence to factual reporting remains paramount.
NationPress
28/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the snapback mechanism?
The snapback mechanism is a provision in the UN Security Council Resolution 2231 that allows for the reinstatement of sanctions against Iran if any party claims that Iran is not complying with the nuclear deal.
Why does Lavrov consider it a trap?
Lavrov views the snapback mechanism as a trap because it allows for unilateral action by Security Council members to block sanctions relief, which could easily lead to reinstating sanctions against Iran.
What was the role of the E3 in this context?
The E3, consisting of Britain, France, and Germany, has been accused of cherry-picking provisions from Resolution 2231 and recently triggered the snapback mechanism, raising questions about the legality of their action.
How has Iran responded to the snapback mechanism?
Iran, along with Russia, has declared that the snapback of sanctions is legally invalid, stating that the E3 were not in a position to activate the mechanism.
What are the implications of this situation for international relations?
The current impasse could significantly weaken the credibility of the United Nations and escalate tensions between Iran and Western countries, particularly in the context of nuclear negotiations.
