Should Supreme Court Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae Resign?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The debate over Supreme Court Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae's potential resignation has intensified, with the presidential office acknowledging the public's demands. As calls for reform echo through the National Assembly, the political landscape is charged with implications for the judiciary's independence and accountability.
Key Takeaways
- The presidential office acknowledges public demand for Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae to consider resignation.
- Allegations involve delays in trials linked to former President Yoon Suk Yeol's martial law.
- The Democratic Party proposes significant reforms to the judiciary.
- Public trust and judicial independence are central themes in the ongoing discourse.
- The timeline for reform is pressing, with a deadline before the Chuseok holiday.
Seoul, Sep 15 (NationPress) The presidential office announced on Monday that it agrees "in principle" with the notion that Supreme Court Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae ought to consider the calls for his resignation.
This statement follows a Facebook post by Rep. Choo Mi-ae, chair of the National Assembly's Legislation and Judiciary Committee, who demanded Cho's resignation, alleging that he has been "shielding" individuals involved in former President Yoon Suk Yeol's martial law implementation by postponing their trials.
During a press briefing, presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung noted, "We agree in principle that if there is public demand and it reflects the needs of the times, it is necessary as an 'appointed authority' to reflect on the plausibility and reasons for such demands."
Kang emphasized the importance of respecting the National Assembly as the "foremost elected body representing the spirit of the Constitution and the will of the people," subtly indicating that the judiciary, as an appointed entity, should take Choo's remarks into account.
Additionally, Kang addressed the judiciary's recent caution regarding the ruling Democratic Party (DP)'s proposed judiciary reform bills, as reported by Yonhap news agency.
"An authority appointed by indirect appointing power should fully observe the legislature's discussions ... rather than doubting the legislature's ability to exercise self-correction and hold internal deliberations," she stated.
Previously, Cho had highlighted the significance of upholding judicial independence, pledging to pursue what he referred to as the "right path" for judicial reform.
In a separate context, DP leader Jung Chung-rae also echoed calls for Cho's resignation during the party's supreme council meeting earlier that day.
The judicial reform proposals by the DP aim to increase the number of Supreme Court justices from the current 14 to 30, revamp the selection process for Supreme Court justices, modify the evaluation method for judges, enhance public access to lower-court rulings, and introduce a pre-examination system for search and seizure warrants.
The party intends to finalize the bills before the extended Chuseok holiday commencing on October 3.
Point of View
I emphasize the importance of judicial accountability in a democratic society. The ongoing discussions surrounding Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae highlight the need for transparency and responsiveness within the judiciary, especially when public trust is at stake.
NationPress
15/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are calls for Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae's resignation growing?
Calls for Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae's resignation are growing due to accusations of delaying trials involving figures associated with former President Yoon Suk Yeol's martial law imposition.
What did the presidential office say about the situation?
The presidential office stated it agrees "in principle" that Cho should reflect on the public's demands for his resignation, emphasizing the need for appointed authorities to consider the needs of the times.
What are the proposed judiciary reform bills by the Democratic Party?
The proposed judiciary reform bills aim to increase the number of Supreme Court justices from 14 to 30 and overhaul the selection and evaluation processes for judges, among other reforms.
How does the public perceive the judiciary's independence?
The public's perception of the judiciary's independence is crucial, especially as calls for reform and accountability arise in light of recent allegations against judicial officials.
When is the deadline for passing the judiciary reform bills?
The Democratic Party aims to pass the judiciary reform bills before the extended Chuseok holiday, which starts on October 3.
