London, Jan 14 (NationPress) The United Kingdom’s protective approach towards extremists poses significant global risks, exacerbating terrorism, weakening international alliances, and jeopardizing innocent lives, as highlighted in a recent report.

The report emphasizes that Khalistani extremism is manifest in various acts of terror and violence associated with its ideology.

As noted by 'Khalsa Vox', the UK faces a critical decision: should it uphold justice by extraditing wanted militants like Paramjeet Singh Pamma, or does it intend to mimic Canada’s trajectory towards diplomatic isolation, which ultimately undermines national interests?

A recent article in 'The Guardian' portrayed Pamma in a “sympathetic light,” suggesting he is a victim of alleged transnational repression by India. This narrative has been criticized as not merely “misleading” but “utter nonsense.”

“Pamma is far from an innocent activist; he is linked to Khalistani militancy and is accused of serious offenses, including bombings and murders. By advising him to enhance his home security and granting asylum, the UK appears to be adopting Canada’s worrying pattern of shielding extremists under the pretense of safeguarding free speech. This shift raises grave questions: Is the UK prioritizing political alliances and diaspora votes over global security and justice?” the report states.

To grasp the absurdity of The Guardian’s framing, one must explore the dark history of the Khalistan movement. The most devastating act carried out by Khalistani extremists was the 1985 bombing of Air India Flight 182, which claimed 329 lives, predominantly Canadian citizens. Though support for Khalistan is virtually non-existent in India, a few of these individuals have sought refuge abroad, especially in Canada and now increasingly in the UK,” it continued.

The report stresses that Pamma’s “ill deeds” extend beyond mere allegations; he has connections to the terror group Babbar Khalsa International (BKI), which was responsible for the 1985 Air India bombing. He also played a significant role in fundraising efforts for BKI, channeling resources into violent activities.

The article in The Guardian, as per the Khalsa Vox report, conveniently neglected Pamma’s background, instead focusing on his claims of threats from “Hindu nationalists.”

“He alleges harassment, including broken car windows and armed visits, yet UK police investigations have not resulted in any charges. Meanwhile, Pamma isolates himself from his family for ‘safety,’ mirroring tactics employed by other militants to evade scrutiny. This victim narrative fails to acknowledge that Khalistani factions have incited violence, such as the 2023 attack on India’s High Commission in London by pro-Khalistan demonstrators,” the report concluded.