What are the UN Security Council’s Concerns Over Sudan's Escalating Violence?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- UN Security Council expresses grave concern over escalating violence in El Fasher.
- Condemnation of atrocities committed by Rapid Support Forces.
- Call for accountability and adherence to international humanitarian law.
- Emphasis on the need for a lasting ceasefire and political resolution.
- Rejection of parallel governing authorities in Sudan.
United Nations, Oct 31 (NationPress) The UN Security Council has expressed serious concern regarding the rising violence in and around El Fasher, located in Sudan's North Darfur state. In a press release issued on Thursday, the council members condemned the attack by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on El Fasher and the devastating effects it has had on the civilian population, according to Xinhua news agency.
The council members denounced the reported atrocities committed by the RSF against civilians, which include summary executions and arbitrary detentions. They voiced serious concern over the increasing risk of large-scale atrocities, particularly those motivated by ethnic tensions.
Furthermore, the council called for accountability for all individuals responsible for these violations. They urged all parties involved in the conflict to prioritize the protection of civilians and adhere to their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law, while ensuring safe and unhindered humanitarian access.
The council reiterated the need for parties to resume negotiations to achieve a lasting ceasefire and a comprehensive, inclusive, and Sudanese-led political process.
Moreover, they urged all UN member states to avoid external interference that could incite conflict and instability, to support efforts towards sustainable peace, and to comply with their international law obligations, including implementing relevant Security Council resolutions.
The council members unequivocally reaffirmed their commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity, and territorial integrity of Sudan. They reiterated their rejection of any parallel governing authority in areas controlled by the RSF.