Akhilesh Yadav lists BJP's 'dark deeds', says cadre in hiding
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav launched a sweeping attack on the Bharatiya Janata Party on Friday, 24 July 2026, alleging that the ruling party is planting its own workers among protesters to discredit youth agitators, while simultaneously bristling when those infiltrators are identified as BJP operatives.
Context
In a lengthy post on X, Akhilesh Yadav argued that even BJP's own sympathisers — paid and unpaid — have grown too embarrassed to defend the party in public. He wrote that these supporters, who spent 10 to 12 years shielding the BJP in arguments with childhood friends, classmates, and colleagues, now find themselves unable to step out of their homes in the face of public anger. 'अब वो जनाक्रोश को देखकर घर से बाहर तभी निकल रहे हैं, जब बहुत ज़्यादा मजबूरी हो' ('Now they are stepping out only when absolutely compelled, seeing the public fury'), he wrote.
Yadav claimed that BJP supporters' WhatsApp groups have gone cold and that they are skipping neighbourhood park gatherings by feigning seasonal illness. He called the ruling party's so-called 'Amrit Kaal' a 'Vish Kaal' — a period of poison — for its own base.
Policy Backdrop
The SP chief listed what he described as five immediate triggers of shame for BJP supporters: alleged donation theft at the Ram temple in Ayodhya; a merciless crackdown on girls in Delhi; violent attacks on youth protesters across the country; threats to frame agitators in false drug cases in Mumbai; and what he called deeply condemnable behaviour by the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister towards a grieving mother who lost her child in the Lucknow fire tragedy.
Beyond these immediate incidents, Yadav compiled a broader charge-sheet: alleged corruption in government departments, exam paper leaks, inflation driven by commission culture, shielding of rape accused, failure to act on a minister's name surfacing in what he called 'the world's most heinous American scandal', protection of those accused of assaulting daughters of Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh, suppression of evidence in the Lakhimpur Kheri killings of farmers, atrocities on the PDA (Pichhda-Dalit-Alpsankhyak) coalition and alleged court conspiracies to undermine their reservations, attempts to erase the Constitution, misuse of bulldozers and encounter killings, and even levelling charges against Shankaracharya.
Several of these allegations draw on documented political disputes: the Lakhimpur Kheri incident of October 2021 resulted in the deaths of farmers during protests against central farm laws; the Ayodhya Ram Temple was inaugurated in January 2024 following the Supreme Court's 2019 title verdict; and exam paper-leak scandals in BJP-governed states between 2020 and 2024 triggered widespread youth unrest.
Stakeholders and Impact
The post is directed at multiple audiences simultaneously: wavering BJP supporters whom Yadav seeks to peel away, youth protesters whose legitimacy he is defending, and PDA communities — the SP's core electoral base of backward classes, Dalits, and minorities. By framing BJP cadre demoralisation as an organic, grassroots phenomenon rather than an opposition-manufactured narrative, Yadav aims to reinforce a perception of organisational decay within the ruling party.
The reference to BJP flags being removed from homes, shops, and vehicles of supporters is a rhetorical device signalling that even symbolic loyalty is eroding. Whether this reflects a verifiable on-ground trend or serves as opposition messaging ahead of electoral cycles remains a matter of political contest.
What's Next
With Uttar Pradesh assembly elections due in 2027, the SP is systematically building a narrative of cumulative BJP failure across governance, law and order, and social justice. Yadav's post signals that the party intends to keep these allegations in public circulation through the monsoon and winter sessions of Parliament, where privilege notices and adjournment motions on the listed incidents could be tabled. The BJP is yet to respond formally to the specific allegations raised in this post.