Akhilesh Yadav accuses Lucknow rulers of taking law into own hands

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Akhilesh Yadav accuses Lucknow rulers of taking law into own hands

Synopsis

Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav on June 5, 2026, alleged that offenders on 'both sides' have taken the law into their own hands and are sitting in Lucknow, sharpening his party's long-running attack on the BJP government's law-and-order record in Uttar Pradesh ahead of the 2027 assembly elections.

Key Takeaways

Akhilesh Yadav posted on June 5, 2026 , accusing those in power in Lucknow of taking the law into their own hands.
His Hindi post translates as: 'The offenders on both sides are sitting in Lucknow, having taken the law into their own hands.' The phrase 'both sides' implies a sweeping indictment rather than a narrowly partisan attack.
Uttar Pradesh law and order has been a central political battleground since the 2017 assembly elections when BJP defeated SP partly on a crime-control platform.
The remark comes with the 2027 Uttar Pradesh assembly elections approaching, a period when such political exchanges typically intensify.

Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav on Friday, June 5, 2026, launched a sharp attack on the ruling establishment in Uttar Pradesh, alleging that those responsible for lawlessness in the state are themselves seated in power in Lucknow. The former Chief Minister posted the remark on X, targeting what he described as a breakdown of impartial governance in the state capital.

In his post, Yadav wrote in Hindi: 'Dono pakshon ke gunahgar to kanoon apne haath mein lekar Lucknow mein baithe hain.' Translated, this reads: 'The offenders on both sides are sitting in Lucknow, having taken the law into their own hands.' The remark is a pointed indictment directed at the state government, suggesting that those who should enforce the law are themselves its violators.

Context

Akhilesh Yadav has consistently positioned the Samajwadi Party as a check on what it characterises as politically motivated policing under the Bharatiya Janata Party government in Uttar Pradesh. His June 5 post intensifies that critique by alleging that wrongdoers on multiple sides of the political divide operate with impunity from Lucknow. The phrase 'both sides' is notable — it does not spare any political actor and implies a systemic rot rather than a one-sided failing.

Policy Backdrop

The law-and-order question has defined Uttar Pradesh politics for over a decade. BJP swept to power in the 2017 assembly elections partly on a campaign that accused the Akhilesh Yadav-led SP government (2012–2017) of allowing crime to flourish and shielding politically connected offenders. Since taking office, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has made anti-crime drives and police encounters a centrepiece of his governance narrative.

Samajwadi Party has in turn accused the Yogi Adityanath administration of selectively targeting opponents while protecting allies. This cycle of accusation and counter-accusation has made policing one of the most contested governance issues in India's most populous state. Yadav's latest post fits squarely within that pattern, though his use of 'both sides' adds an unusual note of sweeping condemnation.

Stakeholders and Impact

The primary audience for this message is Uttar Pradesh's electorate — particularly voters in urban centres such as Lucknow who follow crime and governance closely. Opposition parties may amplify the statement to build pressure on the state administration ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh assembly elections. Civil society groups and residents who have raised concerns about uneven law enforcement are also directly addressed by the critique.

For the BJP government, the remark presents a political challenge: responding risks giving the allegation more oxygen, while silence may be read as an admission. State police and administrative officials in Lucknow are the implied institutional targets of Yadav's charge.

What's Next

Political observers will watch for an official response from the Uttar Pradesh government or ruling party spokespersons. With the 2027 state assembly elections on the horizon, such exchanges over law and order are likely to intensify. Whether Yadav follows this post with specific allegations or a formal political campaign around governance accountability will determine how much traction the remark gains beyond social media.

Point of View

' he sidesteps the vulnerability of his own party's record in government and instead positions the current ruling dispensation as equally complicit in lawlessness. This rhetorical move is consistent with SP's broader strategy of contesting the Yogi Adityanath government's core governance claim ahead of 2027. Whether the charge resonates will depend on whether specific incidents in Lucknow give it factual grounding in the coming days.
NationPress
11 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Akhilesh Yadav say about Lucknow on June 5 2026?
Akhilesh Yadav posted on X that 'the offenders on both sides are sitting in Lucknow, having taken the law into their own hands,' directly targeting the state's ruling establishment over its law-and-order record.
Who is Akhilesh Yadav and why does he criticise UP law and order?
Akhilesh Yadav is the national president of the Samajwadi Party and a Lok Sabha MP. As former Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh (2012–2017) and the main opposition leader in the state, he regularly critiques the BJP government's policing and governance record.
What does 'dono pakshon ke gunahgar' mean in Akhilesh Yadav's post?
The Hindi phrase translates to 'offenders on both sides' — Yadav used it to suggest that wrongdoers across the political spectrum are operating with impunity from Lucknow, implying systemic governance failure rather than a one-sided problem.
How does this fit the UP law and order political debate?
Law and order has been the defining issue in Uttar Pradesh politics since 2017, when BJP defeated SP partly by highlighting crime under the Akhilesh government. Since then, both parties have traded accusations of shielding allies while targeting opponents.
What are the implications for the 2027 UP assembly elections?
With the 2027 Uttar Pradesh assembly elections approaching, Yadav's attack signals that SP intends to contest BJP's governance narrative on crime and policing, one of the ruling party's strongest electoral assets in the state.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 days ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 2 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google