Ahmedabad AMC suspends 40,500 kg mawa worth ₹60.75 lakh ahead of Diwali
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) has suspended the sale of 40,500 kg of mawa valued at approximately ₹60.75 lakh, stored at a cold storage facility in the Gomtipur area of Ahmedabad, after inspectors found that the stock lacked mandatory batch numbers and expiry dates. The action was taken as part of a pre-Diwali food safety drive by the civic body's Health and Food Department.
What Inspectors Found
The cold storage unit in Gomtipur was holding approximately 1,02,000 kg of mawa belonging to around 60 vendors. Nearly 80 per cent of that stock was attributed to 15 major suppliers. Of the total stock, 40,500 kg — the portion found without batch numbers or expiry date markings — has been withheld from sale pending further action.
The largest single holding was traced to Radhika Food Products, which had stored 1,380 bags of 30 kg each under the brand names Rajwadi Sweet (Bajrangi) and Indian Dessert (Nilkanth).
Samples Sent for Laboratory Testing
The department collected six mawa samples under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, from the firms of Hasmukhbhai Mavawala, Tulsi Mawa Centre, Rajwadi Sweet (Bajrangi), Indian Dessert (Nilkanth), Purohit Mavawala, and S K Mavawala. All samples have been dispatched to the Public Health Laboratory for quality testing. The AMC stated that samples from other vendors would be collected in their presence.
The Consumer Safety Concern
Officials drew attention to a key distinction between mawa — also known as khoya, produced by partially removing water from milk — and ready-made sweets such as barfi, which may contain sugar and other ingredients. The AMC cautioned that selling a sweet as a mawa-based product when mawa has not actually been used could mislead consumers about its composition.
The civic body specifically flagged that 'using ready-made sweets instead of mawa to prepare pedas or other products could change their ingredients, sweetness and taste.' This concern is particularly acute during the festive season, when demand for traditional sweets surges sharply.
Legal Framework and Penalties
Officials cited provisions of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, including Sections 26, 50, and 52, which deal with food business operators' responsibilities, the sale of food that differs from what a customer has requested, and misbranded food respectively. They underlined that 'action against a particular shop or product should be based on relevant details and the necessary investigation rather than suspicion alone.'
Establishments found in violation of food safety norms could face penalties or sealing under the Act. The AMC confirmed that inspections and sample collection will continue through the festive season.