Who are you trying to protect?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a fiery exchange in the Lok Sabha, Home Minister Amit Shah rebuked P Chidambaram's claims about the Pahalgam attackers possibly being homegrown. With evidence pointing to their Pakistani origins, Shah raises the critical question of national loyalty and security. Will the Congress party continue to challenge these facts?
Key Takeaways
- Amit Shah refuted claims of homegrown terrorism regarding the Pahalgam attackers.
- Evidence includes Pakistani Voter IDs and recovered items.
- Shah posed critical questions about political loyalty.
- The debate underscores national security concerns.
- Calls for unity among parliamentarians on security issues.
New Delhi, July 29 (NationPress) Union Home Minister Amit Shah criticized the Congress party and veteran member P Chidambaram during a session on Tuesday. He expressed his disapproval of Chidambaram's comments suggesting that the attackers in Pahalgam might be ‘homegrown terrorists’ rather than coming from abroad. Shah stated that there is substantial evidence of the attackers' origins, including the fact that the Voter IDs of the Pahalgam terrorists were Pakistani.
During the 'Operation Sindoor' discussion in the Lok Sabha, Shah condemned both the Congress party and Chidambaram for casting doubt, however slight, on whether those responsible for the deaths of 26 individuals in Baisaran Valley, Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), were indeed from Pakistan.
Shah expressed astonishment at how a former Home Minister like Chidambaram could question the nationality and origin of terrorists.
“Who are you trying to protect? What benefit do you gain by defending Pakistan?,” he questioned, visibly angry.
He reassured the House that the government and investigative bodies possess sufficient evidence proving that the attackers originated from Pakistan.
“They were Pakistanis. Their Voter ID numbers are on record; we also have the rifles they used. Additionally, we have recovered Pakistan-made chocolates that the terrorists carried,” Amit Shah asserted.
“The former Home Minister is providing a clean slate to the Pakistanis,” he remarked.
In a recent interview, Chidambaram suggested that the government had been secretive about the NIA's investigations following the terror incident in J&K.
“Have they identified the terrorists? Do we know their origins? They could be homegrown terrorists. Why assume they came from Pakistan? There’s no proof of that,” he stated.
During another moment in the Lok Sabha, when opposition members, led by SP MP Akhilesh Yadav, interrupted Shah regarding the government’s alleged inaction in prosecuting those responsible for the heinous Pahalgam attack after 100 days, he highlighted the significant achievements of security forces in eliminating the terrorists involved in the April 22 attack.
As the opposition continued to interject, Shah challenged them, saying, “Doesn’t the killing of terrorists bring joy to your faces?”
“I believed that the demise of Pahalgam terrorists would delight all Parliament members, yet this is surprising. You seem unsatisfied. Everyone should unite on matters of national security and refrain from expressing sentiments based on religious identity,” he concluded.
Point of View
It is critical to highlight that the government must maintain a consistent narrative regarding national security. The discourse surrounding terrorism should be factual, focusing on the origins of such threats rather than speculation. Upholding national integrity requires a united front against terrorism, irrespective of political affiliations. The emphasis should always be on evidence-based discussions.
NationPress
30/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Amit Shah say about the Pahalgam attackers?
Amit Shah stated that there is clear evidence indicating that the Pahalgam attackers were from Pakistan, refuting claims made by P Chidambaram suggesting they could be homegrown.
Who is P Chidambaram?
P Chidambaram is a veteran Congress leader and former Home Minister who recently questioned the origins of the Pahalgam attackers.
What evidence did Shah present?
Shah mentioned that the attackers' Voter IDs are Pakistani and that they carried items, including weapons and chocolates, made in Pakistan.
What is the significance of this debate?
This debate highlights the ongoing tensions regarding national security and the origins of terrorism, emphasizing the need for a united political stance.
How did the opposition react?
The opposition, led by Akhilesh Yadav, heckled Shah, questioning the government's actions regarding the attack perpetrated in Pahalgam.
